The original Master Plan
viewed community colleges as colleges of last resort. Anyone with a high school degree could enroll.
(Indeed, some enrollees may not have
high school degrees.) If an enrollee got
on an academic track (some courses offered are vocational/2-year terminal or
recreational), he/she could transfer to a CSU or UC campus. The reality is that many students don’t get
that far. Some community colleges seem to be more effective than others at producing transfers.
What the Times article
refers to is a report – cover shown at right above - that proposes that community
colleges in effect prioritize and focus on students who are making tangible progress
toward transfer. The Times story is at:
The actual report which
will go to the legislature is at:
Data on 2011 transfers to UCLA are at:
(Note that there is a difference between applicants, accepted applicants,
and actual enrollees in the UCLA report.)
A more detailed analysis of the issue than appeared in the LA Times is at:
http://toped.svefoundation.org/2012/01/10/sweeping-changes-okd-for-community-colleges/
A more detailed analysis of the issue than appeared in the LA Times is at:
http://toped.svefoundation.org/2012/01/10/sweeping-changes-okd-for-community-colleges/
No comments:
Post a Comment