Pages

Saturday, March 14, 2026

UPDATE: No Strike News

From the Daily Bruin: The UC reached tentative agreements with three United Auto Workers units that had threatened to strike... The tentative agreement, if approved, will become the first contracts for Student Services and Advising Professionals-UAW and Research and Public Service Professionals-UAW, which were officially recognized by the University in April and September, respectively. Members of UAW Local 4811 – which represents academic student employees, including teaching assistants – also came to a tentative agreement for a new contract after theirs expired Feb. 28. 

SSAP-UAW and RPSP-UAW will receive a minimum 27.8% raise over four years through a step wage system as well as a ratification bonus, caps on increases to health insurance premiums, greater job security, and protections for hybrid and remote work arrangements, according to a joint Instagram post.

UAW Local 4811’s tentative agreement terms include raises of up to 45% for TAs and graduate student researchers, as well as up to 62% for hourly workers over the life of the contract. The terms also eliminate pay disparities across all UC campuses. It includes a $400,000 legal fund for international workers – as well as guaranteed rehiring rights if an international worker loses and regains their visa – and three weeks of paid visa leave...

Full story at https://dailybruin.com/2026/03/13/uc-reaches-tentative-agreements-with-3-united-auto-workers-units.

Sanctions

From a March 9th email:

Dear Colleagues,

The email below, from UCLA’s Office of Export Control, contains important guidance pertaining to business we might conduct with foreign entities.

Some of you may have received this notice already, but given the current international landscape, we are now sharing this broadly. As you conduct business with foreign entities, please be mindful of sanctioned countries, regions, and in some cases, individuals.

Engaging in a sanctioned entity could result in significant penalties for the university. To help prevent this, please consult with your fund manager before initiating any business with a foreign entity. Your fund manager can support you with restricted-party screening to ensure there are no sanction-related concerns.

If you contact the Office of Export Controls directly, we kindly ask that you keep your fund manager included in that discussion.

Thank you for reviewing the information below and for completing the pre-screening procedure before engaging a potential foreign vendor or foreign individuals.

Kind regards,

xxx

-------------------------------------------

From: UCLA Export Controls <xxx@xxx.edu>

Date: February 13, 2026 at 5:10:19 PM PST

Cc: UCLA Export Controls <xxx@xxx.edu>, ...

Subject: Activity Restrictions with Sanctioned Countries

Dear CAOs and CFOs:

The U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) administers and enforces comprehensive sanctions on certain countries and regions.  As of today, these are:

  1. Cuba
  2. Iran
  3. North Korea
  4. Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions of Ukraine

Please also note:

Russia remains heavily sanctioned.  While not comprehensively sanctioned in the same way as the countries/regions above, many activities involving Russia are restricted.

Although no longer subject to comprehensive sanctions, targeted sanctions on Syria may still apply.

Please visit OFAC Sanctions Programs and Country Information https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-information for current information.

Impact on UCLA

Comprehensive sanctions generally prohibit most activities with these countries and regions, including entities and individuals ordinarily resident/located there, unless specifically authorized by the U.S. government through a license.  These prohibitions apply regardless of whether the performance of the activity uses UCLA funds or resources.  The impacted UCLA activities include, but are not limited to:

  1. Business or academic travel (including attending or presenting at a conference or award ceremony)
  2. Imports/Exports (e.g., research samples, equipment, software, artwork)
  3. Academic Collaborations (formal or informal, virtual or in-person)
  4. Research Activities (data sharing, analysis, mentoring, joint publications)
  5. Teaching or guest lecturing (including virtual talks/webinars to audiences in these locations)
  6. Financial transactions (e.g., payments, honoraria, subawards, reimbursements, fee waivers)
  7. Procurement of goods and services (including hiring remote independent contractors)
  8. Sales and service activities
  9. Paid or pro bono patient consultation and care
  10. Remote work
  11. Remote/online learning

The U.S. government has the discretion to impose civil and/or criminal penalties (financial penalties, imprisonment) on the institution and the individual(s) involved for violations of export controls and sanctions.

What To Do

The UCLA Export Control team serves as the campus point of contact for all export control and sanctions matters and is responsible for submitting license applications.  While UCLA has been successful in obtaining licenses from the U.S. government in the past, the process can take several months, so early consultation is essential.  Before initiating activities involving a comprehensively sanctioned country or region, please contact the UCLA Export Control team at xxx@xxx.edu.  We would be very happy to work with you.

Please feel free to share this message with your faculty and staff.

xxx

Director of Export Controls

Straws in the Wind - Part 281

From the Cornell Daily Sun: President Michael Kotlikoff fielded questions regarding Resilient Cornell, University restructuring efforts, fiscal policy and artificial intelligence in an Employee Assembly meeting... During the meeting, Kotlikoff responded to questions from E.A. members, who were invited to submit questions following a Feb. 4 meeting, where the E.A. discussed the University’s Committee on the Future of the American University, staff welfare and austerity measures.

Kotlikoff began his remarks by acknowledging that these are “challenging times for all of us.” Most of the questions that Kotlikoff answered regarded the University’s financial challenges and plans to address them. Kotlikoff specifically answered questions about Resilient Cornell, an initiative launched in October with the purpose of ensuring “Cornell’s long-term financial sustainability while reimagining how we operate across all campuses,” according to its website.

Kotlikoff said that throughout March and April, the initiative’s reorganizational and efficiency models, aimed at reducing spending, will be distributed to heads of units across campus. Then, in April and May, the administration will provide workforce planning and transitional support to programs affected by the initiative. In June, implementation of Resilient Cornell’s recommendations will begin. When asked how much money the University is seeking to save through restructuring, Kotlikoff responded “as much as we can.” ...

Full story at https://www.cornellsun.com/article/2026/03/president-kotlikoff-lays-out-cornell-financial-plans-at-employee-assembly-meeting.

Changing Westwood

The Los Angeles Dept. of Transportation is proposing major traffic changes along Westwood Boulevard including in Westwood Village. There would be a separate bike land, bus-only lane, parking lane, and regular traffic lane. As you can see below, the plan in principle becomes final over the coming summer and is to be implemented in 2027.


There will be an online meeting to discuss this project (which extends beyond Westwood Village and also includes Ohio Avenue) on March 19 at 6 pm. You should be able to register at:

bit.ly/OhioWestwood

(Possible) Strike News

From the Daily Bruin: Union members representing UC academic and research employees said at a demonstration Thursday that they plan to strike as soon as next week if the University does not meet their contract demands. United Auto Workers represents more than 40,000 UC employees across three bargaining units, which are currently in negotiations with the University – UAW Local 4811’s academic student employees units, Research and Public Service Professionals-UAW and Student Services and Advising Professionals-UAW. The union authorized an unfair labor practice strike Feb. 13, with more than 93% of voting members authorizing the vote and announced a “last chance picket” on its accounts Feb. 23.

...UAW Local 4811 has filed multiple unfair labor practice charges against the UC, alleging that the University unilaterally increased fees on certain graduate programs, failed to sufficiently respond to more than 50 requests for information pertinent to bargaining and capped teaching assistant appointments. RPSP-UAW and SSAP-UAW also filed ULP charges against the UC for alleged bad faith bargaining and failures to respond to information requests. Heather Hansen, a UC Office of the President spokesperson, said in a Wednesday statement that the University strongly disagrees with the union’s ULP claims. RPSP-UAW and SSAP-UAW are both currently in the process of negotiating their first contracts, and UAW Local 4811 – whose current contract expired Feb. 28 – began negotiating its contract in July 2025...

Full story at https://dailybruin.com/2026/03/12/uc-uaw-units-may-strike-as-soon-as-next-week-if-university-doesnt-meet-demands.

Friday, March 13, 2026

The Budget: First, let's preserve. Then let's question - Part 3 (more on expenses)

In our last iteration of post-Agostini budget examination, we noted a discrepancy between UC's version of UCLA's expenses and UCLA's expenses as reported in the pre-Agostini period. As blog readers will know, UCLA CFO Agostini was terminated after he told the Daily Bruin that UCLA financial reports for the period before he arrived were inaccurate. That is a Bad Thing for a CFO to say because it suggests that administrators, some of whom are still on the payroll, produced misleading figures. (Bond holders might also be upset.) Just before his fatal remarks, however, he did produce a budget book with new data.

In our prior analysis of reported UCLA expenses as reported by UC versus those reported by UCLA, we found a UC series running from 2014-15 to 2024-25.* More recently, prowling around on UC website, we found an older series said to be updated through May 22, 2025.** It reported different numbers for UCLA that were somewhat higher. Further investigation found the discrepancy was caused by omission of interest expenses in the more recent information. We have redone our chart using the older series that includes interest. See below:

Note again that the UC and UCLA series in the pre-Agostini period do not agree. Why? Yours truly doesn't know, except that the discrepancy isn't explained by the omission of interest. Note that the Agostini numbers and the UC numbers are very close. It may be that he was relying on the same sources that systemwide UC did in producing his budget book.

We will look at the revenue side of the story in a later post. (Revenue and expense data from the older series go back to 2003-04.) But keep in mind that yours truly is not a forensic auditor. All yours truly can do is preserve public budget documents so they don't disappear. The older UC-derived expense series documents - which, as just noted, go back to 2003-04 - have been added to our preservation site:

https://archive.org/details/ucla-budget-book-v-final-feb-2026.

Perhaps these documents might be of use to the Academic Senate as it seeks to understand UCLA's current financial situation.

====

*https://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2026/03/the-budget-first-lets-preserve-then.html.

**https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/about-us/information-center/revenue-and-expense-data.

Free

From columnist George Skelton, LA Times:

One unique perk California kids enjoyed for generations was tuition-free college. Now, a candidate for governor promises to bring that back... The candidate, former congresswoman Katie Porter of Orange County, even suggests a way to pay for her bold pledge... She‘d raise the corporate income tax a notch.

OK, it’s very unlikely to ever happen. The powerful business lobby would scream, even though California companies would benefit from a more educated workforce. And California’s public universities would probably cry about their revenue streams having to rely on unpredictable corporate profits rather than the pocketbooks of students’ parents.

...[One] reason for making college tuition-free again, she said, is that “it was a promise made to the people” by the California Master Plan for Higher Education... Free tuition [would be] only for California residents who are undergrads. And only in their third and fourth years at the University of California and California State University. If they desired free tuition in their first two years, they could attend community college. Many community colleges already waive course fees for full-time, first-time students...

Full column at https://www.latimes.com/california/newsletter/2026-03-09/skelton-monday-politics-newsletter-porter-college-tuition.