Last Wednesday, Chancellor Frenk circulated a statement on a variety of campus issues including the budget. We reproduce the budget section below:
Budget Model
We are undertaking a comprehensive assessment of our financial model to ensure UCLA remains strong for decades to come. This work includes developing a new budget model while reviewing capital planning and major administrative functions.
Financial Update: Building a Stronger Financial Future for UCLA
In March 2026, we shared a projection that the central account would close FY26 with a deficit of approximately $220 million. I am gratified to report that the actual year-end deficit was significantly lower, at $58 million.
This improvement reflects a series of concerted measures taken throughout the year. While we implemented permanent reductions in many areas, a significant portion of the FY26 improvement resulted from one-time measures. At the same time, we assumed new recurring costs, including mandated wage increases and additional funding necessary to support critical operations. As a result, the $58 million year-end deficit is positive news for FY26, but it does not represent a comparable reduction in our ongoing structural imbalance. The underlying central structural deficit therefore remains in the range we previously reported (https://mcw4-bg0jt18s-ppxrgd5mn-5zq8.pub.sfmc-content.com/l5iciwkzaq5), giving us reason to persevere in our efforts.
It is also important to note that these figures refer specifically to the central account. Several campus units continue to operate with expenditures that exceed revenues, including UCLA Athletics, where a significant financial gap persists. I recently asked Tim Harris to serve as our new CEO and director of UCLA Athletics.
He is taking a disciplined approach to addressing the department’s structural deficit, with a clear commitment to greater financial accountability, aligning expenses with available resources and building a sustainable operating model.
We will continue to identify annual solutions that mitigate the immediate impact of these structural gaps. At the same time, we are developing the financial and operational changes necessary to achieve sustained budget balance. Ultimately, our solutions must both close the central structural gap and ensure that units across the campus operate within their available resources.
Source: https://chancellor.ucla.edu/messages/framework-for-uclas-future.
===
Here's the problem. There is no definition of "deficit." We know that whatever it means, it doesn't include UCLA Health, a very big chunk of the campus budget that seems to be run autonomously from Murphy Hall's budgetary process. If deficit means revenue < spending, the difference has to be coming from somewhere. There are only two sources for that kind of deficit: running down reserves and/or borrowing. What are the revenues? What is the spending? What reserves do we have? If the "structural" deficit is $220 million and that remains valid, but the actual deficit was $58 million, there must have been a lot of one-time cuts that presumably can't be maintained on an ongoing basis. (If they could be maintained, presumably the structural deficit would be reduced to $58 million.) So that raises the question of what is meant by "structural deficit."
There is reference to a new "financial model." It is unclear what that term means. Is it some kind of budget forecasting program? Or is it just basic accounting software that allows quick data retrieval? Does it mean that we will eventually have timely publication of the budget? Right now, the latest budget available is 2024-25, not the budget for last year to which the $58 million deficit applies. Yet there must be budget numbers for last year since we know what the deficit for that year was.