Saturday, May 31, 2014
Diversity Course Requirement
A governing faculty committee voted unanimously Friday to approve a proposal for a new diversity requirement. The vote was the first of a series of formal reviews the proposal must pass for the university to implement it. At the College of Letters and Science Faculty Executive Committee’s meeting on Friday, faculty members approved the proposal under the condition that some smaller changes would be made to its wording, said Christina Palmer, the chair of the College Faculty Executive Committee and a professor of psychiatry and biobehavioral sciences. Though the wording of the proposal has not been finalized, it is set to create a requirement that would have students in the College take one course that is a minimum of four units at UCLA to fulfill, she said...
College of Letters and Science faculty members are expected to vote on the proposal in the fall. The College faculty have voted down diversity-related requirement proposals twice before, once in 2012 and once in 2004. The university also attempted to establish a diversity-related requirement back in 1987...
Full story at http://dailybruin.com/2014/05/30/faculty-executive-committee-approves-diversity-requirement-proposal/
Posted by California Policy Issues at 11:48 AM No comments:
Labels: campus climate survey, UCLA
Can of Worms
The fossil fuel divestment issue has also become a concern of certain Jewish groups that fear that oil/coal/gas divestment will lead to anti-Israel divestment:
Whether UC needs to be in the middle of such debates is something the Regents need to consider.
Posted by California Policy Issues at 11:34 AM No comments:
Labels: UC Regents, UCLA
Make it big
A former UC Berkeley research administrator with a prior embezzlement conviction has been charged with stealing tens of thousands of dollars from the university to help pay for her children's private-school tuition, make catering orders and pay other expenses, authorities said Friday...
Full story at http://m.sfgate.com/crime/article/Charge-UC-Berkeley-administrator-stole-thousands-5517119.php
So how does it happen that endless time can be spent haggling over a few dollars of lunch expenses while overt stealing - as above - on a larger scale is possible? The answer has to be that university accounting systems are designed to prevent you from stealing less than $50.
Posted by California Policy Issues at 9:23 AM No comments:
Labels: UC Berkeley
Friday, May 30, 2014
Reminder: Big Donations Don't Have to Go to Demolitions and Construction
Philanthropist Steve Tisch, co-owner of the New York Giants and an Academy Award–winning film producer, has pledged $10 million to the department of neurosurgery at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA for the BrainSPORT Program, which has been renamed the UCLA Steve Tisch BrainSPORT Program
Due to be announced by President Obama Thursday at a White House summit on youth and sports concussions, the new funding — the single largest gift from an individual to a medical center for a concussion-related initiative — will enable UCLA to create the first U.S. fellowship program to train pediatric neurologists who specialize in sports concussions, and establish the world’s most sophisticated research, prevention, diagnosis and treatment program for concussions and brain injuries, with a particular emphasis on young athletes...
Full release at http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/steve-tisch-donates-10m-to-ucla-program-devoted-to-researching-treating-sports-concussions-especially-in-youth
You can even get good PR without building anything:
So the next time someone comes up with a bright idea like the UCLA Grand Hotel, just say no. (Or, as in that case, don't suggest it to the donor.) And think about alternatives that go into research, scholarships, and teaching.
Posted by California Policy Issues at 12:19 PM No comments:
Labels: fund raising, new hotel-conference center, UCLA
Judge hands CalPERS 1st-round loss in long-term care lawsuit
Jon Ortiz, State Worker blog of Sacramento Bee:
CalPERS can be sued for allegedly mishandling its privately-funded long-term care insurance program, a Los Angeles court has tentatively ruled, clearing the way for a trial. Judge Jane Johnson turned aside CalPERS request to throw out the case, which contends that the fund’s board members violated their personal duty to watch out for members’ best interests. The fund also breeched policy contracts and dealt unfairly with policyholders, according the the lawsuit.
The Los Angeles Superior Court complaint, if granted class-action status, would represent about 150,000 CalPERS members who purchased long-term care insurance between 1995 and 2004 to cover convalescent care, in-home living assistance and similar services. Nearly all the policies guaranteed inflation-adjusted payments for the life of the policyholders, many of whom believed their premiums would never be increased.
CalPERS stopped selling the so-called “lifetime, inflation-protected” policies a decade ago. It incrementally raised premiums on existing policyholders because the program was going broke. Officials have blamed under-performing investments, underpriced policies and higher-than-expected payouts for the trouble. Private-sector insurance carriers have had the same experience long-term-care coverage. Many have exited the business.
Lawyers got involved, however, when CalPERS announced it would hike premiums 85 percent for the most lucrative plans starting next year. Members who had purchased policies and paid premiums for nearly a decade or more were outraged. CalPERS asked the court to throw out the case for a variety of reasons, but Johnson ruled that none were valid. The tentative ruling isn’t yet final, however such decisions are rarely overturned...
Full story at http://m.sacbee.com/sacramento/db_294804/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=eb42YegP&full=true#display
Right now both CalPERS - and its customers for long-term care - are both big losers.
Posted by California Policy Issues at 11:35 AM No comments:
Labels: CalPERS, health care
Who is in the senate?
|An earlier senate|
Faculty members at the University of Southern California have elected Ginger Clark, associate professor of clinical education in the university's Rossier School of Education, as president-elect of the Academic Senate. That means she will automatically become president, which is significant because Clark is off the tenure track.
Posted by California Policy Issues at 10:13 AM No comments:
A case of shoot-first/ask-questions-later?
More than 13,000 people have signed a petition urging the University of California to divest from gun manufacturers, following last week’s shooting near UC Santa Barbara. The petition was created Wednesday on MoveOn.org by Campaign to Unload, one of the leaders of a divestment movement against gun manufacturers.
The UC already divested from all gun manufacturers following the Sandy Hook shooting in 2012, said Brooke Converse, a UC spokeswoman...
Full story at http://dailybruin.com/2014/05/30/gun-divestment-group-petitions-for-uc-to-disclose-investments/
Posted by California Policy Issues at 8:11 AM No comments:
Labels: UC Regents
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Listen to the Regents Committee on Investments, May 22, 2014
In this meeting, the Committee on Investments mainly reviewed investment returns of the various funds handled at the systemwide level plus the campus-level foundation endowments. However, apparently the Committee also set up its task force on fossil fuel divestment. The word "apparently" is used because whatever the Committee did on that issue must have occurred during the closed part of the meeting.
There was one public comment speaker on fossil fuel divestment. She indicated in her remarks that a coal-only approach - which the governor seemed to look kindly on - wasn't enough. Oil and gas would have to be included. The notion of omitting the pension plan was not mentioned. As we have noted in prior posts, both the governor and the legislature seem reluctant to touch the oil industry which is significant in California and might provide tax revenue. Coal doesn't exist in the state so it doesn't raise political and revenue issues. In short, by creating its task force, the Regents may have delayed, but not avoided, an eventual clash.
Apart from UC funds, the Committee gets routine reports on campus-level foundations and their investments and returns. Riverside stands out because, unlike the others, its foundation is 87% invested in equities (much of it foreign) - odd for a fund that is supposed to be more like a savings bank than a speculation. Regents debated what to do. Riverside in recent times has done well because the market has done well. But it doesn't seem like a model of prudence.
You can hear the meeting at the link below. The coal-won't-be-enough comment comes around minute 3.
Posted by California Policy Issues at 6:39 PM No comments:
Labels: UC Regents
No privacy in emails
Although such requests in the past have come from conservative groups, in this case the request to a U of Virginia law prof seems to have come from what might be seen as the left. It is unlikely in this case that the request will be honored because of a prior court decision in Virginia. But what happens there doesn't govern what might happen in other states including California. And each case is unique
The moral: Don't say anything in emails that you might not want to see in public. Even if you use an outside provider such as gmail or Yahoo, an email you sent to someone at a public university could be targeted.
The specifics of this particular tale can be found at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/05/29/gay-rights-groups-foia-request-professors-research-pits-privacy-vs-academic-freedom
Posted by California Policy Issues at 3:07 PM No comments:
Labels: academic freedom, U of Virginia
Moving up a tier
To simplify administration and respond to employee concerns, UC is changing the eligibility rules for retiree health benefits.
This means that those employees who previously had been moved to the new 2013 eligibility rules because they were not vested in UCRP on June 30, 2013 or because their age plus years of UCRP service was less than 50 at that time will no longer be subject to the eligibility rules that went into effect on July 1, 2013.
“Many of our employees who were close to meeting the criteria for the grandfathering provision were understandably concerned about the rule of 50,” Duckett said. This keeps people under the rules that were in place when they were hired as long as they stay at UC.
The change also simplifies administration of retirement benefits and is clearer to employees, Duckett said...
Full UC announcement at http://ucnet.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/2014/05/uc-simplifies-retiree-health-benefits-rules.html
Still, even if you're in a better tier, it's best not to get sick, as yours truly can attest based on recent experience:
Posted by California Policy Issues at 1:58 PM No comments:
Labels: faculty pay, health care, UC
What the headline could be
[The article in the Bee is at http://m.sacbee.com/sacramento/db_98822/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=QltJjPUy.]
Hypocrisy is not new to Sacramento. The Regents can't entirely keep politics away from UC. After all, some Regents, the ex-officio politicos on the Board, are politicians. But it will be interesting to see what the Regents do with the coal vs. all-fossil-fuel issue.
In the meantime, we can all get another day older and deeper in debt:
Posted by California Policy Issues at 8:53 AM No comments:
Labels: governor, politics, UC Regents
|Office of Instructional Development TA training program registration|
Brooke Converse, a UC spokeswoman, said she thinks the University has offered teaching assistants a substantial financial package. She added that it is prohibited under federal law for universities to hire undocumented workers.
Tobias Higbie, an associate professor of history at UCLA who signed the petition, said he is mostly concerned that the quality of teaching at the UC may decline during the strike because teaching assistants help instruct students and work closely with them on coursework...
Full story at http://dailybruin.com/2014/05/29/petition-calls-for-negotiations-with-uaw-local-2865/
UPDATE: "UC academic service workers announce second strike" is at http://dailybruin.com/2014/05/23/uc-academic-service-workers-announce-second-strike/. [This article predates the one above but has additional information.]
Posted by California Policy Issues at 8:24 AM No comments:
Labels: Napolitano, UC
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
That's a nice garden. Say, wasn't there another one?
|UCLA's other garden|
Full story at http://www.losangelesregister.com/articles/city-600074-garden-kretz.html
As blog readers will know, UCLA has been trying to rid itself of the Hannah Carter Japanese Garden in Bel Air and gotten enmeshed in litigation which blocked the sale. Yours truly once served on a university committee with Mildred Mathias and is happy to see her garden enhanced. Maybe with the new university interest in gardens, some better resolution than court decisions can be found for the "other" garden.
Posted by California Policy Issues at 11:47 AM No comments:
Labels: Japanese Garden, UCLA
|UCLA vigil for UC-Santa Barbara killings|
Samuel Wurzelbacher, better known as Joe the Plumber, insisted the deaths of innocent people "don't trump" his constitutional rights in an open letter to the families of victims in Friday's shooting rampage near the University of California, Santa Barbara. Wurzelbacher's letter was published on Barbwire Monday, days after one shooting victim's father blamed "craven, irresponsible politicians" and the National Rifle Association for his son's death...
Full story at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/27/joe-the-plumber-guns_n_5397981.html
|The plumber who can't pipe down|
Posted by California Policy Issues at 10:27 AM No comments:
Labels: UC-Santa Barbara, UCLA
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)