Pages

Showing posts with label Rutgers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rutgers. Show all posts

Monday, August 10, 2026

UC & Other Universities Support Harvard

From The Dartmouth: [Dartmouth] signed onto an amicus brief filed July 22 with the First Circuit Court of Appeals in support of Harvard University’s April lawsuit against the Trump Administration. Thirty-five other colleges and universities also signed the brief, including all Ivy League universities except Harvard. In the ongoing case, the Trump administration is appealing a September 2025 ruling in favor of Harvard after the administration froze $2.2 billion in federal grants because the university refused to comply with federal demands to make institutional changes such as reforming admissions and hiring practices, shutting down diversity, equity and inclusion practices and addressing antisemitism “or other bias” in campus programs. 

The brief argues that “even temporary cuts” to federal research funding could have “permanent effects” which “endangers” the “life-changing and history-altering innovations” that arise from “basic research” conducted at colleges and universities... Amici institutions listed advancements in “scientific progress” made possible by federal funding — such as the computer, DNA sequencing, the pacemaker and the “decades-long collaboration among academia, government and industry” which produced the internet — as “enormous long-term benefits” of university research...

Full story at https://www.thedartmouth.com/article/2026/08/flavin-dartmouth-signs-brief-in-support-of-harvard-in-research-funding-lawsuit-against-trump-administration

List in image above and brief at:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca1.53667/gov.uscourts.ca1.53667.00108480602.0.pdf.

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Straws in the Wind - Part 341 (Let's just play Pomp & Circumstance and go home)

From Inside Higher Ed: The Rutgers University at New Brunswick School of Engineering canceled a pro-Palestinian alumnus as its convocation speaker after, the university says, some graduating students complained about his social media posts. In March, the school’s website published an “Alumni Spotlight” interview with Rami Elghandour, chairman and chief executive officer of biotechnology company Arcellx. The piece touted his social justice and humanitarian advocacy and noted he was an executive producer of The Voice of Hind Rajab, an Oscar-nominated film about a Gazan girl killed by Israeli forces in the recent war.

Elghandour was set to speak at the school’s May 15 convocation, but the school canceled. In a statement to Inside Higher Ed, the university said the “School of Engineering was recently informed that some graduating students would not attend their graduation ceremony due to concerns about the invited speaker’s social media posts, including one that shared an inflammatory claim.” ...

Full story at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2026/05/07/rutgers-disinvites-grad-speaker-after-he-criticizes-israel.

===

From the Jewish Journal: When Georgetown Law School announced recently that Dr. Morton Schapiro, Professor and President Emeritus of Northwestern University, would be its commencement speaker, Interim Dean Joshua C. Teitelbaum noted that Schapiro is “highly informed about the challenges facing colleges and universities today,” and that “there are few who can speak to it with as much clarity and insight as he can.”

...[But] in his Jewish Journal column, Schapiro has written about a range of subjects, including the need for hope and optimism and improving the public discourse. ...He has also expressed supportive views of Israel. That was a bridge too far for a group of law students... The outcry became loud enough that Schapiro could only imagine what was reserved for him on the day of the address. ...He felt he had little choice but to withdraw...

Full story at https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/columnist/editors-note/388524/georgetown-commencementspeaker-mort-schapiro-backs-out-after-firestorm-caused-by-his-jewish-journal-columns/.

===


Or direct to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrzApHZUUF0.

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

18 friends... But not UC

From Forbes: A group of the nation’s leading research universities has requested that a federal judge allow them to file a legal brief supporting Harvard University’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over more than $2 billion in frozen federal grant money. The 18 institutions requesting permission to file an amicus curiae (or “friend of the court”) brief are:

Boston University; Brown University; California Institute of Technology; Colorado State University; Dartmouth College; Johns Hopkins University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Michigan State University; Oregon State University; Princeton University; Rice University; Rutgers University; Tufts University; University of Maryland, College Park; University of Oregon; University of Pennsylvania; University of Pittsburgh; and Yale University.

The request was granted on Friday by Judge Allison D. Burroughs, who is presiding over the federal lawsuit. The schools have not yet filed the brief, but in their request they state that each of them “has received millions of dollars in federal investments in scientific research over the decades.” ...

Full story at https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2025/06/07/18-research-universities-back-harvards-lawsuit-against-funding-cuts/.

Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Just so you know

Did you know there is a betting market on resignations of university presidents? Would you pay 4 cents for a $1 contract that USC president Carol Folt will resign by September 1? 

Apparently, some folks are willing to make that bet.

Other university presidents you can bet on:

Northwestern, Indiana, Rutgers, U of North Carolina, and Princeton. (No UCs seem to be on offer.)

Just a little factoid for a slow news day.

More details at https://kalshi.com/markets/unipresidents/university-presidents-ousted.

Friday, May 24, 2024

The Congressional Hearing

Chancellor Block appeared yesterday before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce's series of hearings on campus antisemitism. Below is a link to his opening statement.* Also at the hearing were the heads of Northwestern (Michael Schill) and Rutgers (Jonathan Holloway). 

Of the three, I would say Schill got the most attention and more of the critical questions. Example: It was noted that Schill was quick to fire a football coach when a fuss was made by alumni but that he emphasized continuing investigations and the need for due process when asked about consequences those involved in an encampment. He was mainly a target for having negotiated a deal with protesters to disband, seeming to promise to discuss some things that were contrary to NWU policy and possibly civil rights laws.

If you were looking for more insight into the questions raised on this blog about decisions that were made at UCLA, who made them, and why, you won't find out more from the hearing than you already know. There was no apology. The written statement, according to the LA Times, indicated that more preparedness would have helped. See:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-05-23/ucla-gene-block-antisemitism-hearing-live-updates.

If there was blame, it was in effect shifted to UC President Drake's guidelines about not using police, although Drake was not named. But then, the other witnesses were unapologetic, too. 

Note to the Regents' committee searching for a replacement for retiring Chancellor Block: See if you can find someone who will admit to making mistakes without requiring a Congressional hearing. Everyone makes mistakes. But it would be nice to find someone who admits to them and will apologize when they occur. Maybe that quality doesn't generally exist in the world of college presidents, but there might be some exceptions.

Block said that there will be planning for orientation over the summer for incoming students that will emphasize campus rules regarding protests. Particular problems in the med school and a mandatory course are being investigated. He seemed aware of a social media video shown in the Committee of a Jewish student being blocked from a walkway but he had no information about who was involved in the blocking. Block said he called for police during the attack of the guys with bats but had no information about the prolonged delay concerning their arrival or why no arrests have been made.

There was also a question to Block about masks with a citation of a California statute that would seem to restrict mask wearing at demonstrations if some other offense is being committed.** Block mentioned COVID as an exception. But he also noted that COVID recommendations for masks were not in effect.

Block's opening oral statement is at the link below:

Or direct to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhGiU9FnXF8.

====

*The full hearing is at https://www.youtube.com/live/4bu4eGIDNss. Back up at: https://ia601406.us.archive.org/35/items/a-laugh-a-tear-a-mitzvah/UCLA%20Northwestern%20Rutgers%20at%20House%20Education%20%26%20Workforce.mp4.

**[185.] Section One Hundred and Eighty-five. It shall be unlawful for any person to wear any mask, false whiskers, or any personal disguise (whether complete or partial) for the purpose of:

One—Evading or escaping discovery, recognition, or identification in the commission of any public offense.

Two—Concealment, flight, or escape, when charged with, arrested for, or convicted of, any public offense. Any person violating any of the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.

Source: https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-pen/part-1/title-7/chapter-8/section-185/.

Wednesday, December 13, 2023

UCLA to be Investigated by Dept. of Education

First from yesterday's The Hill:

The Education Department has added six schools, including Stanford University, the University of California, Los Angeles, and Rutgers University, to its ongoing probe over alleged discrimination, including antisemitism and Islamophobia.

According to the Department of Education’s (DOE) Office for Civil Rights’s list of higher education and K-12 institutions under investigation Monday, the other schools added include the University of Washington, the University of California, San Diego, and Whitman College.

The probe, announced last month, is to address the “alarming rise in reports of antisemitism, anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and other forms of discrimination” in schools in the wake of militant group Hamas’s Oct. 7 surprise assault into southern Israel.

The investigations are revolved around “alleged ancestry violations” of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which requires schools that receive federal financial assistance address discrimination. If schools do not address issues around discrimination, they risk losing federal funding or referral to the Department of Justice.

...UCLA did not immediately respond to The Hill’s request for comment.


Comment: As is well known by now given recent events, as a public university, UC and its campuses are covered by 1st amendment guarantees of free speech, even if objectionable. Courts impose a high bar of these protections which generally covers "hate speech," so long as it doesn't rise to immediate incitement of violence. (Note that the 1st amendment does not cover Harvard, MIT, and the University of Pennsylvania, the three universities that were the feature of the recent Congressional hearing affair in which their presidents seemed to cite the 1st amendment.)

However, the constitution - because it protects free speech - does not inhibit commentary by university officials - chancellors, Regents, others - when incidents arise. Regardless of the legalities, uneven responses create a Bad Look and are suggestive of preferences and discrimination, intended or not.

On this blog, we have referred back to the contrast between the chancellor's response in 2011 to the "Asians in the Library" affair. To summarize, a UCLA students made derogatory remarks on YouTube about Asians at UCLA, thinking - apparently with parental support - it would attract attention and make her some kind of celebrity. It did attract attention, but not of the kind she wanted. She took it down when an uproar arose, but others put it back up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70qcgIiWKk0s. Chancellor Block, in response, posted his own YouTube video expressing outrage at the remarks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6feGp0GQVJ8.

Fast-forward to 2015. A student posts antisemitic remarks on Facebook, far more objectionable than "Asians in the Library." A Jewish student wrote a protest to the Daily Bruin describing the Facebook post:

...[The Facebook post] makes dehumanizing and stereotypical allegations about Jews and the power of the “Jewish collective,” saying, “You’re f—ing trolls, armchair politicians who do nothing but pick your nose, scratch your a– … you come into our communities and destroy our small businesses.” She then goes on to say, “You own the entertainment industry, and apparently you have so much power that you want to get me fired and sent back to the ditch I came from, don’t you? Flex your little muscles, do your worst … Where I come from, people like you, with your privilege and your wealth, are not welcomed because we know that with you comes the end of our world, sacrificed at the whims of your fancy.”

The student then attacks the Jewish state and the legitimacy of Jewish self-determination saying, “Go back to Israel, then f—ing Zionist pigs. You don’t belong here either, this land belongs to the indigenous people who were already here. Since you’re so superior, go murder some Palestinian children so you can have their parents arrested and move into their home. Greedy lifeless pieces of s— people. Capitalist colonizers who steal and kill from other races to promote your dead ideologies.”

To add pain to injury, she has the audacity to speak ill of the Jewish experience during the Holocaust. She says,“… Spare me your (H)olocaust stories. My people have been systematically enslaved and destroyed by this country, who removes them every time they become a nuisance to white people. No one is hauling your Jewish a– to a concentration camp today …”

She adds, “… go back to Poland or whatever freezer-state you’re from, and realize that faith does not constitute race,” completely denying the fact that Jews were almost always treated as second-class citizens in Europe, if they were treated as citizens at all.

Lastly, the student then savagely denies any and all diversity of the Jewish community saying, “If you’re a Jew, you’re white. Not black, not middle eastern, not Asian – white.”

And let’s not forget her final farewell, “Kiss my a– you Zionist bastards – I hope you all burn in hell on earth for the crimes committed by your people in the name of their Gods.”...*

No video response from the chancellor resulted. 

The Facebook incident was not the only affair in 2015. Another antisemitic incident involving student government occurred in the same year.** Again, no video response response from the chancellor resulted. Eventually, a lower official made a comment in the form of a letter to the editor of the Bruin.

Now, it can be argued - as some have - that college and university presidents should not be expected to make statements about world affairs such as the Israel-Gaza War. But note that the three situations described above - Asians in the Library, Facebook posting, student government - were campus affairs, not world affairs. It would be difficult to make an argument that top college and university officials should not comment on campus affairs. So, then the question is whether the officials' responses are equivalent regardless of the group targeted. 

Yours truly has no idea whether the Dept. of Education investigators are aware of the asymmetry described above. But it's all in the public record.

====

Saturday, September 23, 2023

Rank - Part 3 (comparisons and equivalencies)

As might be expected, the latest US News and World Report college rankings have created controversy, in part because of a shift in methodology that shifted ranks up and down compared with the prior year.

You can read more about the controversies - somewhat similar to the earlier controversies concerning law schools and med schools at:

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/admissions/traditional-age/2023/09/22/us-news-rankings-changes-spur-complaints-and-apologies.

But rather than get into the weeds, yours truly thought we might benefit from looking at comparisons and equivalencies. As you likely know, both UCLA are touting themselves as the best public university. But the public qualifier actually means both tied for 15th. 

But that means the two are not quite so good as Chicago, but are a bit better than Rice.

Moving down the list we find that UC-Davis and UC-San Diego at #28 are equivalent to each other and also to the U of Florida.


UC-Irvine and UC-Santa Barbara are equivalent to NYU at #33.

 

At #60, we find that UC-Merced is equivalent to Renssalear and Santa Clara U.


At #76, UC-Riverside is like SUNY-Buffalo.


And finally at #76, UC-Santa Cruz is like Rutgers and the U of Illinois-Chicago.


Go figure.

Saturday, April 15, 2023

The Times They Are A'Changing

This seems to be strike season in the world of higher education. UC had its large student-worker strike not that long ago which significantly raised pay for such workers and tended to upset the existing funding model of graduate student education and employment. 

There has been a trend in higher ed to shrink the proportion of "ladder" (tenure-track) faculty and rely more heavily on various forms of "temps," i.e., instructors without tenure and on short contracts. A major strike at Rutgers University in New Jersey is currently underway which involves both tenure-track and nontenure faculty. One of the major issues has been job security for the latter group.

From NJ.com: As the historic strike of three Rutgers University faculty unions reached the end of its first week Friday, the unions announced a potentially “transformative” tentative agreement on job security for non-tenured full-time professors. These 1,005 faculty members will no longer have to reapply for their jobs at the end of each contract; the presumption will be their contracts will be renewed, according to a union statement.

“This is game-changing for faculty members who haven’t had the protection of tenure,” said Rebecca Givan, president of the largest striking union, Rutgers AAUP-AFT. “We’ve taken an important step toward confronting the precarity faced by over 70% of the educators, researchers, and clinicians at Rutgers.” The other 30% are tenured or tenure-track professors, who have job security.

The union considered this a “core proposal” in the negotiations, according to the statement. Rutgers had no comment on the issue but said in its morning statement that after Thursday’s negotiations, “we are making significant progress with the continued help, engagement, and leadership of the governor and his senior staff.”* ...

Full story at https://www.nj.com/education/2023/04/rutgers-union-announces-tentative-agreement-on-core-issue-more-remain.html.

In effect, the graduate education model is eroding, the use of temps in higher ed may now begin to erode, and - as noted in prior postings - the amateur student-athlete model is eroding with compensation in the form of name-image-likeness payments. Here in California, the old 1960 Master Plan has been eroding for years with CSU pushing into doctoral education and community colleges pushing to provide 4-year bachelors degrees.

The Times They Are A'Changing.


===

*Strikes by public workers in New Jersey have been presumed to be illegal in the past, although no state statute so declares. The governor of New Jersey, however, has asked Rutgers not to go to court to try and end the strike and instead to negotiate a settlement, if possible, with the unions involved. The New Jersey situation is somewhat similar to what existed in California at one time where there was a presumption that public worker strikes were illegal, but no actual statute banning such strikes. Eventually, when tested in court, it was ruled that since there was no statutory bar, public sector strikes in California generally were legal.

Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Other Universities Beginning to Slide Beyond January 18

Although January 18 is still the magic date for resuming or starting in-person classes at the various UC campuses including UCLA, other universities are now moving to later dates:

From Inside Higher Ed: More institutions are moving classes online to deal with Omicron. Rutgers University announced that the system would spend several weeks online before returning to in-person instruction on Jan. 31. Students have been told to return to housing Jan. 29 and 30, not Jan. 16-17. “Information on any financial credits or offsets will be forthcoming,” the university said. Denise M. Trauth, the president of Texas State University, wrote to students and employees that while classes would start, on schedule, Jan. 18, they would all be online until Jan. 31. She stressed that no classes were being canceled. Students still may move into their residence halls as previously scheduled. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte announced that classes would begin as scheduled Jan. 10 but would be online only until Jan. 24. Huston-Tillotson University, in Texas, will be online from Jan. 10 to Jan. 24.

Source: https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2022/01/05/rutgers-texas-state-and-other-colleges-go-online.

Friday, March 26, 2021

Vaccine Requirement at Rutgers: Coming to UCLA?

From Inside Higher Ed: Rutgers University announced Thursday that it would require students to be vaccinated against COVID-19 before coming to campus next fall. The public institution in New Jersey may be the first or at least among the first universities to take the step of mandating students receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Three different vaccines are currently authorized for emergency use, but not yet fully approved, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. In making the decision on whether to require vaccines approved through the emergency use authorization (EUA) process, colleges are treading untested legal ground.

Antonio Calcado, executive vice president and chief operating officer at Rutgers, said the vaccine requirement had been thoroughly reviewed by the university’s Office of General Counsel. He said the university, which currently is conducting about 97 percent of its classes online, wants to find a way to bring students back to campus safely...

Full story at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/03/26/rutgers-will-require-covid-vaccine-students-fall.

Note: UCLA has required other vaccinations in the past. Presumably, it could require one for coronavirus.

Monday, May 16, 2016

Obama on Exclusion of Commencement & Other Speakers

From transcript of keynote address at Rutgers U commencement yesterday: ...And if participation means voting, and it means compromise, and organizing and advocacy, it also means listening to those who don’t agree with you. I know a couple years ago, folks on this campus got upset that Condoleezza Rice was supposed to speak at a commencement. Now, I don't think it's a secret that I disagree with many of the foreign policies of Dr. Rice and the previous administration. But the notion that this community or the country would be better served by not hearing from a former Secretary of State, or shutting out what she had to say—I believe that’s misguided. (Applause.) I don't think that's how democracy works best, when we're not even willing to listen to each other. (Applause.) I believe that's misguided. If you disagree with somebody, bring them in—(applause)—and ask them tough questions. Hold their feet to the fire.  Make them defend their positions. (Applause.) If somebody has got a bad or offensive idea, prove it wrong. Engage it. Debate it. Stand up for what you believe in. (Applause.) Don't be scared to take somebody on. Don't feel like you got to shut your ears off because you're too fragile and somebody might offend your sensibilities. Go at them if they’re not making any sense. Use your logic and reason and words. And by doing so, you’ll strengthen your own position, and you’ll hone your arguments. And maybe you’ll learn something and realize you don't know everything. And you may have a new understanding not only about what your opponents believe but maybe what you believe. Either way, you win. And more importantly, our democracy wins.  (Applause.) So, anyway, all right. That's it, Class of 2016...
Video below:

Saturday, December 12, 2015

Pay by the Piece at Rutgers?

But you can work from home!
With the advent of Google Scholar and other metrics for faculty productivity, advancing one’s career as a professor is much more of a numbers game than it used to be. Still, the traditional system of peer review in hiring, tenure and promotion decisions has retained a good deal of nuance. Scholars in the same field as those they’re evaluating know that while one project may not be as prestigious as another, for example, a good degree of academic innovation might be worth a little professional risk. But is that system under threat? Full-time faculty members at Rutgers University at New Brunswick say that it may be, in light of the university’s contract with a faculty productivity monitoring company called Academic Analytics.
Rutgers professors say they don't need the system, which is based on a patented algorithm for measuring faculty productivity, and that what little data they’ve been able to obtain to so far include some serious errors. On Monday, the faculty of the School of Arts and Sciences will vote on a faculty union-backed resolution asking the university not to use Academic Analytics data in personnel and curricular decisions, and to give faculty members access to data collected by the company...

Full story at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/12/11/rutgers-professors-object-contract-academic-analytics
http://www.academicanalytics.com/

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Dead MOOcs at Rutgers

From Inside Higher Ed:

Graduate faculty members at Rutgers University at New Brunswick have once again rejected administrators' plans to create more online degree programs through a partnership with Pearson. Last October, faculty members in the Graduate School blocked any new programs from being approved, objecting to Pearson's share of tuition revenue -- 50 percent -- and an "obscenity clause" in the contract that Pearson later clarified.  On Wednesday, administrators introduced a new resolution that, instead of blocking programs, tasked the executive vice president with producing a report on the partnership with Pearson...

Instead of voting on the proposal, faculty members passed their own resolution, 26-2 with two abstentions, to not even consider the administration's suggestion...

Full article at: http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2014/05/09/rutgers-graduate-faculty-rejects-online-degree-compromise

Death is hard to beat:

Friday, December 13, 2013

Maybe It's Better to Get Than to Give

We have been following the issues of online education on this blog.  $10 million has been earmarked by UC for online course development.  So what is currently on offer?  And who is doing the offering?
Above is the current listing.  [Click to enlarge and clarify.]  Berkeley, Riverside, Davis, and Irvine seem to be doing the offering.  UCLA students can take these online courses (Spanish is now fully enrolled) but UCLA isn't offering any such courses to other campuses, at least according to the UC websites below.  So, despite the holiday season, maybe it's better to get than to give.

http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/30393

http://crossenroll.universityofcalifornia.edu/about/all-courses.html

http://crossenroll.universityofcalifornia.edu/los-angeles/index.html

Meanwhile, apparently there is faculty opposition at Rutgers to private gift giving:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/12/13/rutgers-u-liberal-arts-and-science-faculty-join-graduate-school-pearson-boycott

Friday, October 11, 2013

Online Drones

Inside Higher Ed today is reporting on resistance to online courses at Rutgers.  Blog readers who have followed the online ed/MOOC debates won't see surprises except for one element:

The effort to offer more graduate degree programs online at Rutgers University at New Brunswick hit a snag on Wednesday, as faculty members in the Graduate School voted to block new programs from being approved...

Faculty members have to sign a separate contract with the university to create an online course, which Hughes said strips them of their intellectual property rights. A draft of the agreement states that “Due to the particular requirements of an online program, this license specifically includes the right to have the course taught by others.” 

“A lot of faculty see red when they read that,” said [Anthropology Professor David] Hughes, who pointed out the clause would allow the university to “unbundle” the role of an instructor. In a worst-case scenario, he said faculty members could in the future be replaced by an underpaid “drone army of course facilitators” hired to teach course material created by their predecessors...



Perhaps you will recall former UC president Yudof's statement at the Regents that we wouldn't have droning:
Note: Another article in Inside Higher Ed reports:

...AAUP says that colleges and universities have ramped up ownership claims to property subject to copyright, as well – including online course content...

Full article at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/10/11/new-aaup-report-urges-faculty-protect-intellectual-property-rights