Pages

Showing posts with label Arizona State University. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arizona State University. Show all posts

Friday, July 3, 2026

Straws in the Wind - Part 391

From Inside Higher Ed: Arizona’s $18.29 billion fiscal year 2027 budget, which Gov. Katie Hobbs signed [in June], eliminates millions in education funding for public universities and slashes several one-time investments that have helped students access higher education. The budget, which [went into] effect July 1, removes $16.3 million from state universities, including $8 million from Arizona State University, $2.6 million from Northern Arizona University and $5.7 million from the University of Arizona. It also eliminates funding for several scholarships and programs for which the state’s FY2026 budget allotted money.

Program cuts include $1.5 million previously invested in dual enrollment and $16.3 million for the Arizona Promise program, which offers scholarships to low-income students. The budget also slashes $6 million in funding for the Community College Adult Education Workforce program, a four-year-old program that provides adult learners with a college education and workforce training...

Full story at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2026/06/24/arizonas-2027-budget-cuts-millions-college-funding.

Sunday, August 24, 2025

Straws in the Wind - Part 80

From Inside Higher Ed: Arizona State University typically welcomes over 17,900 international students to its four campuses each year, but this fall, due to a variety of complications, the university expects only 14,600 international students will attend this fall—an 18 percent drop. If the projection holds, international students will account for 7.5 percent of ASU’s 194,000 students this fall, according to an Aug. 11 news release. In comparison, during the 2023–24 academic year, ASU hosted 18,400 international students, with a total enrollment of 183,000, or more than 10 percent.

The change is in part due a drop in master's applications from international students, but primarily driven by challenges to visa appointments, according to a university spokesperson...

Full story at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2025/08/13/asu-projects-18-drop-international-student-enrollment.

Friday, June 27, 2025

Straws in the Wind - Part 22

From KJZZ-Phoenix: Tensions were high... [June 12] at the Arizona Board of Regents [ABOR] meeting in Tucson. Students and staff at the state’s public universities spoke out ahead of a vote to scrub board policies of words like diversity and affirmative action. Sixteen people signed up for public comment, many of them students of color or LGBTQ+ students who said they feel unsupported by their universities amid the Trump administration’s anti diversity equity and inclusion (DEI) rhetoric.

...ABOR sent the following statement to KJZZ:

“We appreciate the input from our community as we work to comply with the laws that govern us. The largest portion of Arizona public university budgets — built to serve over 250,000 students and 30,000 employees — comes from the federal government. The policy updates remove outdated references to revoked federal requirements. It also more clearly describes the board’s continued compliance with laws prohibiting discrimination and our ongoing commitment to providing college access to all Arizona students.”

Full story at https://www.kjzz.org/education/2025-06-12/arizona-university-students-staff-express-outrage-over-decision-to-remove-diversity-from-policies.

Friday, August 11, 2023

Things Change - Part 4 (Hints on what the Regents Discussed)

The San Francisco Chronicle carries a story about the closed-door meeting of the Regents dealing with the collapsing Pac-12 and its impact on UC-Berkeley:

UC Regents take no action as Cal mulls the future of its athletics

Steve Kroner, Aug. 9, 2023  Updated: Aug. 10, 2023 

Tuesday’s closed meeting of the UC Regents talking with Cal Chancellor Carol Christ and UC President Michael Drake about the future of Cal Athletics was a discussion about how they got here and what the options are going forward, a source confirmed to The Chronicle on Wednesday.

The teleconference lasted approximately an hour. No actions were taken as Cal tries to find a conference home beginning with the 2024-25 school year. Cal, Stanford, Oregon State and Washington State are the lone Pac-12 schools that don’t have a conference affiliation set for next year. UCLA, USC, Oregon and Washington will move to the Big Ten. Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado and Utah will join the Big 12.

The source confirmed that the four main options discussed in general terms for Cal are joining the ACC, the Big Ten or the Mountain West or, as a distant last resort, becoming an independent.

The notion of Cal and Stanford joining the ACC took a hit Wednesday night when both the Associated Press and ESPN reported that ACC presidents opted not to vote on whether to invite the Bay Area schools, apparently because it was clear there weren’t enough votes (12 of 15 were needed) for the additions of Cal and Stanford. 

Earlier on Wednesday, there were reports that Notre Dame — which is an ACC member in all sports but football — was pushing for the conference to make an offer to Cal and Stanford, but that wasn’t enough, at least on Wednesday night. The ACC reportedly also is considering SMU.

In December, when the UC Regents approved UCLA’s move to the Big Ten, they forced UCLA to pay Cal anywhere from $2 million to $10 million per year beginning in 2024. The thought being that because the departures of UCLA and USC from the Pac-12 would cost the conference a significant amount of money in its next media-rights deal, UCLA should compensate Cal. The source said that during Tuesday’s Regents meeting, there was no discussion of whether to adjust UCLA’s payments to Cal.

And the source believes there will not be another Regents meeting regarding Cal Athletics’ future until the Bears get more clarity on what their next step will be.

Source: https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/college/article/uc-regents-take-no-action-cal-mulls-future-18286513.php.

Thursday, May 4, 2023

Patents, Patents

Patent Office in 1924

We're catching up with some data on patent production at various universities. (No, yours truly doesn't know the story behind the high scores of two Saudi universities.)

From Forbes: The University of California system led the world in 2022 for the number of U.S. utility patents awarded to a university. Across its 10 campuses and six academic health centers, the UC system received 570 patents, outpacing runner up MIT by more than 200 patents. Utility patents are patents granted for inventions. They are issued for the invention of a new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or a new and useful improvement in those inventions. They generally permit their owners to exclude others from making, using, or selling the invention for a period of up to twenty years.

The list for 2022 was compiled by the National Academy of Inventors (NAI) in its report, Top 100 Worldwide Universities Granted Utility Patents. The report relies on data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark office to create its list, which NAI compiles annually.

The top 20 universities worldwide were:

  • University of California 570
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology 343
  • King Fahd University Of Petroleum and Minerals 233
  • The University of Texas 225
  • Purdue University 192
  • Stanford University 184
  • Harvard University 179
  • King Abdulaziz University 177
  • California Institute of Technology 164
  • Arizona State University 160
  • Johns Hopkins University 159
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology 147
  • University of Michigan 145
  • Seoul National University 144
  • Zhejiang University 142
  • University of Florida Research Foundation 139
  • Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (University of Wisconsin) 132
  • Duke University 126
  • University of Colorado 115
  • University of Pennsylvania 108

Of the top 20 universities, 15 were located in the United States, and 38 American institutions are included in the top 50 universities.

Commenting on the University of California’s ranking, Theresa Maldonado, UV Vice President for Research and Innovation, said in a news release from the university, “the UC system has a vibrant culture of innovation, entrepreneurship and cross-disciplinary collaboration across our 10 campuses, so it’s gratifying to see that reflected in this ranking from the National Academy of Inventors. As a public institution, our faculty and researchers are working to improve lives every day with their groundbreaking work.”

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2023/04/26/university-of-california-system-leads-all-universities-worldwide-for-most-patents/.

Monday, April 24, 2023

New Partnership Agreement

From Forbes: The National Education Equity Lab, an education justice nonprofit, has enlisted more prestigious universities to offer college courses and supports to students in some of the nation’s poorest high schools. The new partners include Morehouse College and the University of California System. They join Princeton, Stanford, Georgetown, Cornell, Wesleyan University, Barnard College, the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Spelman College, Brown University, Howard University, and Arizona State University, all of which were early providers in the Ed Equity network.

Founded in 2019 by Leslie Cornfeld, a former federal civil rights prosecutor and later an advisor to New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and two U.S. Secretaries of Education, Ed Equity Lab has quickly become one of the nation’s leading models for preparing low-income and underrepresented minority students to enroll and succeed in college. It’s helping fill the college pipeline with talented students who might have otherwise never believed they could succeed at college. The Lab follows a simple plan, a first-ever national model: deliver and support college credit-bearing courses taught by faculty from a network of leading colleges and universities in teacher-led high school classrooms, at no cost to students.

Here’s how it works. School districts serving low-income students are invited to participate, and they offer the opportunity to principals in Title 1 high schools. Principals pick the high school teachers who assist the college faculty in offering the course, and they also select the students - typically about 25 per course. Many Ed Equity Lab high schools offer multiple courses – meaning students can graduate with a semester or more of transferable credits under their belts, resulting in substantial tuition savings...

Commenting on his university’s new partnership with the Ed Equity Lab, University of California president Michael V. Drake said, “The University of California is committed to expanding access to higher education for students of all backgrounds. We are proud to collaborate with the National Education Equity Lab to further that goal - and reach more students than ever before.”

Full story at https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2023/04/21/university-of-california-morehouse-join-other-top-schools-in-national-effort-to-close-college-opportunity-gap/.

Saturday, July 11, 2020

Conference-only

Pac-12 News Release: The Pac-12 CEO Group announced today that the fall season for several Pac-12 sports, including football, men’s and women’s soccer and women’s volleyball, would schedule Conference-only games, and that it is delaying the start of mandatory athletic activities, until a series of health and safety indicators, which have recently trended in a negative direction, provided sufficient positive data to enable a move to a second phase of return-to-play activities.  

The CEO Group made clear that it hopes to play football and all other fall sports provided that it can meet the health and safety needs of its student-athletes and obtain appropriate permissions from state and local health authorities.  Today’s decision will result in the start dates for the impacted sports being delayed. The decision is effective immediately across all Pac-12 member universities and was made following a meeting of the Pac-12 CEO Group (Friday)...

Full release at https://pac-12.com/article/2020/07/10/pac-12-ceo-group-announces-decision-schedule-conference-only-play-several-fall

Note (from the release): The Conference comprises 12 leading U.S. universities - the University of Arizona, Arizona State University, the University of California, Berkeley, the University of California at [sic] Los Angeles (UCLA), the University of Colorado, the University of Oregon, Oregon State University, Stanford University, the University of Southern California, the University of Utah, the University of Washington and Washington State University.
====
From CBS SportsThe Pac-12 Conference will move to a modified, conference-only football schedule for the fall, with an announcement regarding 2020 college football season schedules to come no later than July 31. The news comes one day after the Big Ten announced its own conference-only schedule.
The conference will also delay the start of mandatory athletic activities "until a series of health and safety indicators, which have recently trended in a negative direction, provided sufficient positive data to enable a move to a second phase of return-to-play activities." Athletes who choose not to participate due to concerns about COVID-19 will continue to have their scholarships honored by and will remain in good standing with their team...
Full source at https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/pac-12-follows-big-tens-lead-moves-to-conference-only-college-football-schedule-for-2020-season/
---
UPDATE: Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott has tested positive for COVID-19. The 55-year-old tested positive late this week after experiencing flu-like symptoms and is self quarantining at the direction of his doctor, according to a statement by the conference. Scott is continuing to carry on his duties as commissioner remotely...


Friday, February 28, 2020

Nothing to Crow About

Arizona State University President Michael Crow is not a candidate for the top job at the University of California system, ASU said.

Crow's denial comes after an anonymously sourced news story by the Mercury News claimed he was a candidate for the UC system role. The story cited Pac-12 conference sources who said Crow was a leading contender for the position.

"He's not a candidate," ASU spokeswoman Katie Paquet said. "He's committed to ASU and Arizona."

Crow was not available for an interview, Paquet said...

Source: https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-education/2020/02/27/arizona-state-university-president-michael-crow-name-mentioned-university-california-system-search/4894307002/

Well, if he ever was a candidate, he now seems to have flown away:

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Online Education: Who goes there?

Remember the old 1993 New Yorker cartoon about how your identity on the Internet could be hidden? One dog says to another, "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog."

The Mercury-News carries an article about a revelation that came out as a byproduct of the admissions scandal of payments for substitutes to take online courses for students who were already admitted. See below:

...There has been conflicting research on whether students actually cheat more online than in person. Melanie N. Clay, executive director of extended learning at the University of West Georgia and editor of the Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, said: “cheating can and does occur in both traditional and online environments.”

“There is no perfect system,” Clay said.


Jason M. Ruckert, vice chancellor and chief digital learning officer at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida, said in some ways, technology gives online courses an edge in defeating cheaters. Software can track locations where students log in, learn to recognize a student’s keystroke patterns and check for plagiarism by scanning other  published reports.


“I believe identifying a student cheating in an online classroom might be easier than doing so in a large face-to-face course,” Ruckert said.


UC spokesman Andrew Gordon said that the system checks “VPN addresses” of its students enrolled online “to ensure that the individuals submitting assignments and taking exams are the students who are enrolled.”
But Newton said those measures aren’t always employed and don’t always work.


“There are tools that can prevent this or make it more likely you’ll get caught,” Newton said, “but if you hire somebody to take classes for you and the URL is always the same, whether it’s in Liberia or San Jose, those things won’t catch it.”


Schools and companies that make anti-cheating software for them are, Newton said, in a constant arms race with “essay mills” that sell work to students and develop workarounds.


Clay acknowledged that “a more difficult problem to detect” in either online or traditional classes is “when students pay others to write original papers for them.”


Newton said administrators are far more confident than their teachers that online cheating isn’t rampant.


“Deans and presidents will tell you cheating just doesn’t happen and their standards are rigorous and that’s just nonsense,” Newton said. “The professors I speak to will tell you, ‘Yeah it’s fairly common.'”


But as with the admissions system, schools tend to rely on the honor system and the threat that cheaters will face serious consequences. Arizona State would only say about the latest case that it “investigates all allegations of academic dishonesty that it receives.”


The most effective measures to defeat cheaters, Newton said, are having incentives for teachers to catch cheaters, severely punishing those who are caught, regularly updating anti-cheating software and using video to establish a personal recognition between the teacher and student. But he added that universities see online classes as cash cows and aren’t motivated to employ costly measures to counter cheating.


“We don’t even have a comprehensive sense of how broad the problem is,” Newton said. “I think they’re just afraid of the answer because they don’t have a good solution.”


Full story at https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/12/15/theres-a-new-front-in-the-college-cheating-scandal-online-classes/

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Another Admissions Scandal Touches UCLA

Five California residents arrested in cheating scheme to obtain student visas for Chinese nationals

Brittny Mejia 3-12-19 LA Times
 
The scheme, which began in 2011, centered around the owner of a for-profit Newport Beach college admissions company that wealthy parents paid to help their children cheat on college entrance exams and to falsify athletic records of students to enable them to secure admission to elite schools.

Federal authorities arrested five California residents on Tuesday, accusing them of helping Chinese nationals obtain student visas by taking their English proficiency tests for them.

Authorities allege the scheme was facilitated by 23-year-old Liu Cai, who entered the U.S. on a student visa to attend UCLA.

There were over 40 students, “who took advantage of this scheme,” and who were able to attend top-ranked colleges, including UCLA, Columbia University and New York University, according to Homeland Security Investigations special agent Christopher Kuemmerle.

“We have so many students that are honest, that work hard to get into the university of their dreams and yet that spot might be taken by someone who cheats,” said Kuemmerle, who supervises the multi-agency Los Angeles Document and Benefit Fraud task force, which investigated this case.

The five arrests were among many that took place on Tuesday, as federal prosecutors also accused top chief executives, two Hollywood actresses and a legendary fashion designer of taking part in a separate, audacious scheme to get their children into elite universities through fraud, bribes and lies. Fifty people, across academia and college sports as well as a cadre of super-wealthy parents, have been charged in what prosecutors say is the largest college admissions scam ever prosecuted.

In the student visa case, a 26-count indictment handed down by a federal grand jury last week charges Cai, Quang Cao, Elric Zhang, Mohan Zhang and Samantha Wang with conspiring to use false passports, using false passports and aggravated identity theft as part of the scheme to impersonate Chinese nationals in order to take the Test of English as a Foreign Language exam.

To obtain a student visa, foreign citizens have to apply to study at a school authorized by the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Many of those schools require foreign citizens whose first language is not English to certify proficiency in the language by getting a particular score on the TOEFL exam.

Cai is alleged to have paid for and registered 14 Chinese nationals, referred to only by their initials, for the exam over a one-year period in 2015 and 2016, according to the indictment. Cai, Cao, Elric Zhang, Mohan Zhang and Wang are alleged to have impersonated those citizens by using false, forged and counterfeited People’s Republic of China passports.

The passports were in the names of the foreign citizens, but bore the defendants’ photographs. The indictment alleges that Cao, of San Francisco, took at least four of the exams, Elric Zhang, of Los Angeles, took at least five, and Mohan Zhang, of Cerritos, and Wang, of Corona, took at least two each.

The sixth defendant — Tuan Tran, 33, who is alleged to have taken at least one TOEFL exam with a false identification document — is believed to be living in Taiwan. After the tests, Cai paid three co-defendants about $400 per test from his PayPal and Venmo accounts, authorities said.

“The imposter test takers were generally U.S. citizens of Chinese descent that spoke English well and that could breeze through the exam,” Kuemmerle said. “A lot of these associations were made at Chinese American social organizations.”

Based on fraudulent TOEFL exams, students were able to “cheat their way” into universities across the country, including UC Irvine, UC Riverside, Arizona State University and the University of Alabama, Kuemmerle said. However, a number of them were not able to successfully graduate.

“Some of them weren’t able to cut the muster, because that old adage, ‘If you’re cheating, you’re really cheating yourself,’” Kuemmerle said. “If they can’t match the language, they might not have the aptitude to do well in an American university.”

Last year, as UC Santa Barbara enrolled more students from China, professors complained about a lack of English skills. In the last decade, the University of California’s enrollment of international students has more than tripled. Chinese students’ campus presence has grown more than eightfold.

Faculty said they had pressed in recent years for international students to be better screened for English-language skills, concerned that a troubling number of Chinese undergraduates lacked college-level abilities in the language, even though admissions standards generally mandate that foreign students score at "intermediate" levels on the TOEFL exam.

Kuemmerle called Tuesday’s arrests the “first phase of the investigation.”

“At some point, we may make a decision to discuss directly with the schools certain individuals who we know cheated on the exam,” he said.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations, the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service’s Fraud Detection National Security Section are investigating the case.

The conspiracy count in the indictment carries a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. The charge of using a false passport carries a maximum sentence of 10 years. Aggravated identity theft carries a mandatory consecutive two-year sentence.

“Hopefully this will deter others from even thinking about taking an examination on behalf of somebody who is trying to get into one of these schools from overseas,” Kuemmerle said. “We want to reserve those spots for honest, hard-working applicants who does his or her own test and doesn’t cheat the system.”

Source: https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-chinese-visa-fraud-20190312-story.html

Saturday, November 25, 2017

Listen to the Regents Meeting of Nov. 16, 2017

With this posting, we complete our audio preservation of the November 2017 Regents meeting.

The board meeting of Nov. 16 began with public comments. Topics included free speech/hate speech, urging the Regents to visit campuses, DACA students, and retiree health care.

After public comments, the UCSA president reported on plans to create Regents report cards, political developments including concerns over the tax bill currently in Congress, and demands for Regent Pattiz to be removed from committees, resign, be banned from campuses, etc. It might be noted that Pattiz was originally appointed in 2001 by then-Gov. Davis, reappointed by Gov. Brown in 2014, and thus has a term that continues into 2026. He hasn't offered to resign, the Regents have not taken any action to remove him from committees, and in fact he reported to the board subsequently on the national labs subcommittee activities.

When the Finance and Capital Strategies committee reported, Lt. Gov. and ex officio Regent Newsom indicated that the 7.25% interest rate used for retirement calculation was too high. He suggested that the rate should probably be below 7%. 

There was a lengthy presentation (followed by discusssion) by the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) concerning public opinion about higher ed and projected labor force needs for adults with college degrees.

A special resolution was adopted allowing Regent Guber to continue teaching for free at UCLA on entertainment-related topics.

Finally, at a special session called for the purpose, the Regents reviewed the report on misconduct by the UC prez and others with regard to the state audit. UC prez Napolitano apologized.

You can hear the audio of the meeting below:


Regular session:
https://archive.org/details/1regentsBoard111617edited/1regentsBoard11-16-17edited.wma

Special session:
https://archive.org/details/1regentsBoard111617edited/1regentsSpecial11-16-17.wma

Friday, February 8, 2013

Reality Check on Online Higher Education

Arizona State University (ASU) offers online undergrad and grad degree programs.  It is actively recruiting Californians. Click on http://asuonline.asu.edu/?utm_source=ca-asu-edu&utm_medium=ca-asu-edu&utm_campaign=california-visit  If you visit this link, you will be given information in written and video format.  A sample course format is at: http://asuonline.asu.edu/how-it-works/learning-online-at-asu  So what is the cost?   

The ASU website offers a course calculator: https://students.asu.edu/costs  I used the calculator and entered that I was an Arizona resident, that I was seeking an online undergraduate degree, and that I would be enrolling as a freshman.  The cost per academic year was reported to be $10,792.  Of course, there are no living expenses payable to ASU since I would do this program online (so no dorm, etc.).   That amount is not all that far from what UC charges as the $13,200 sticker price for a California resident who is on campus (excluding room and board, etc.). See http://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/paying-for-uc/cost/  The ASU price is also far removed from the notion of a $10,000 degree that some state governors around the country are touting ($10,000 for the entire four-year program). 

To the extent that the ASU program can serve as an example for UC, it suggests that a big cost saving is not to be had.  Of course, you could enroll more students – presumably students who meet UC’s admission standards – via an online program.  And conceivably the marginal cost of an added student might be less than the price above.  But if you poke around on the website, it appears that you would have to cover the expense of a significant marginal cost for all the tech support, interaction support, course grading, etc.  There is more involved than sticking a video camera in the back of a classroom.

We have noted in prior posts that the idea has captured the governor and legislative leaders that online ed is the magic solution to the monetary gap between their desire for no tuition increases and what they are prepared to devote to UC in the state budget.  But the idea is a fantasy.  At the recent Regents session at which these views were fostered, I did not see anyone click on the ASU website or its cost calculator.  Maybe somebody should.