A brouhaha is developing at Berkeley - where there were recent celebrations of the 1960s Free Speech Movement - over an invitation to TV personality Bill Maher to speak at a December graduation ceremony. A student group has protested that Maher has made anti-Moslem remarks on his program. Berkeley Chancellor Nicholas Dirks has said, however, that the invitation stands:
UC Berkeley’s administration is insisting that a campus speech by
Bill Maher will proceed as scheduled in December despite opposition from
students who say the offer should be rescinded to protest what they
allege were anti-Muslim statements by the political satirist. Citing
Maher’s right to free speech, UC Berkeley Chancellor Nicholas B. Dirks
said in a statement that “the invitation will stand, and [I look]
forward to welcoming Mr. Maher to the Berkeley campus." The
statement noted that the decision “does not constitute an endorsement”
of any of Maher’s views although it supports the television
personality’s right to express them. “More broadly, this
university has not in the past and will not in the future shy away from
hosting speakers who some deem provocative,” the statement said...
Full story at http://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-ln-uc-maher-20141029-story.html
Dirks' statement at http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2014/10/29/campus-statement-on-commencement-speaker/
Dirks' position has been supported by news commentators of various persuasions:
http://m.sfgate.com/opinion/saunders/article/Trying-to-silence-Bill-Maher-in-the-cradle-of-5856467.php
and
http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-ra-bill-maher-berkeley-commencement-20141028-column.html
The current student regent, Sadia Saifuddin, who has supported the anti-Israel divestment movement, is quoted at the above link:
"I believe there is a fundamental difference between free speech and
hate speech as well as a difference between Maher being allowed to
express his views, and being given the honor of giving the keynote
address sponsored by the university … I don’t stand for any
university-sponsored action that makes students feel unsafe and
unwelcome.”
There is some irony in that statement since Jewish groups have complained that the divestment proponents make Jewish students feel unsafe and unwelcome. For example, a complaint to the regents about anti-Israel demonstrations refers to such events creating a "hostile environment for Jewish students."
See http://www.amchainitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Presentation-for-UC-Regents-1_22_14.pdf
Undoubtedly, there will be more to come on this issue. Stay tuned.
No comments:
Post a Comment