Pages

Thursday, July 21, 2016

Sharing the Wealth

Well, don't they say that God helps them who help themselves
A former Pinole resident was sentenced this week to 18 months in prison and ordered to pay back the nearly $400,000 she embezzled while working for a science education program at UC's Lawrence Hall of Science. Shari DeSondra Michell Ward admitted in a February plea agreement to defrauding and stealing $389,948 from the Berkeley institution, between 2008 to 2014, according to the U.S. attorney's office. Ward, 45, worked at UC Berkeley's Lawrence Hall of Science, first as an administrative assistant with the Full Option Science System, and later as a financial analyst with budget and finance responsibilities over the program. She admitted to using the university's travel systems to arrange personal air travel for herself, family and friends, and also purchasing tickets which she sold to individuals for her own profit, according to U.S. Attorney Brian J. Stretch...

Full story at http://www.eastbaytimes.com/ci_30149198/ex-uc-staffer-sentenced-stealing-400-000-while
Back in the day, your truly always had the impression that university accounting systems were designed to prevent you from stealing less than $50. That may still be the case.

Revisions at the Regents

The LA Times provided a summary of recent Regents' actions in revising their bylaws and other matters. As usual, we will eventually provide an indefinite archive of the audio of the meetings currently under way. But it takes much time to do it and yours truly's time is limited. We, however, continue to note that if the Regents would simply provide for an indefinite archive, rather than one year, our own efforts would be unnecessary.

Here is what the LA Times has as a summary:

UC Regents take steps to streamline board operations, dig more deeply into crucial issues

Teresa Watanabe  7-20-16

University of California regents Wednesday approved a sweeping overhaul of board operations, the first in nearly five decades, saying it would free up more time for deeper discussions of crucial issues.
The regents, gathered in San Francisco for a three-day meeting, also discussed continued financial challenges they say will hamper efforts to accommodate 5,000 new California students this year despite a state funding boost.

And UCLA Chancellor Gene Block briefed regents on the campus’ response to the June 1 shooting death of a prominent engineering professor.

In a major board reorganization, regents voted to streamline operations by reducing the number of committees to six from 10 and directing them to meet concurrently rather than sequentially, as they now do. That change will give regents more time to delve into issues and help them gain expertise in their committee subjects, said Regent Russell Gould, who developed the proposal along with board Chairwoman Monica Lozano.

The full board would then have an extended discussion of the issues at hand on the second day of a two-day meeting. Several regents have long expressed frustration that the board’s bimonthly meetings were filled with so many presentations -- rehashing written material they had already received -- that little time was left for in-depth discussions. “This is a very, very big and significant change and will give us the opportunity to dig deep into problems that the university is facing,” Regent Sherry Lansing said.

Gould and Lozano modified the original proposal to address objections that it would concentrate too much power among a select few and reduce transparency and public accountability. Former regent Velma Montoya, some UC faculty members and others had written critical articles and blog posts saying the changes would diminish the regents’ watchdog role over the 10-campus UC system. But Gould told regents the proposal was “in no way an attempt to limit voices.”

The proposal now affirms that all regents have the right to raise any issue at any time and that all open committee meetings will be videotaped and posted online. The board would retain the right to weigh in on all committee actions, rescind any decision delegating authority to UC administrators and maintain the right to investigate allegations of misconduct by a regent.

Concerns that a new Governance and Compensation committee would become too powerful were eased by retaining the board chair’s right to appoint members. Those changes swayed such critics as Regent Norman Pattiz. “The one thing I was really concerned about … was concentration of power and authority of a few regents,” he told his colleagues. “That problem has been addressed. I am willing to ... trust my fellow regents.”

The changes will take effect at the regents’ next meeting in September.

In other business, the regents praised Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature for giving UC an additional $125 million in state funds for 2016-17, a 4% increase, after years of massive cuts. The money includes $18.5 million to enroll 2,500 more California students next year, $20 million for support services for low-income and underrepresented minority students, $22 million to promote innovation and entrepreneurial ventures and $35 million for deferred maintenance. A $5-million firearms research center is expected to be housed at UC Davis, with faculty at all campuses able to apply for funds.

However, UC failed to obtain $6 million more it had requested to enroll additional graduate students, a shortfall that some regents said would hinder efforts to provide enough teaching assistants needed to instruct the additional California undergraduates expected this year.

Daniel Hare, the outgoing chair of the UC Academic Senate, told regents that a dramatic decrease in state support in the last few decades had nearly doubled the student-faculty ratio at his UC Riverside campus  to 29 to 1 from 14 to 1 in the 1980s. The larger classes have compelled many faculty members to switch to machine-scored multiple choice exams over essays and reduced opportunities to get to know students well enough to write meaningful letters of recommendation for them. “I can’t say UC today is able to offer the same quality of education”  as in the past, Hare said. 

In his briefing on the UCLA shooting, a murder-suicide in an engineering building, Chancellor Block said officials sent out more than 500,000 emails and 250,000 text messages through campus alert systems during the crisis. Hundreds of officers from multiple law-enforcement agencies responded and some of the 2,500 campus members who had received active shooter training led efforts to lock doors, turn off lights and take other cautionary steps, he said.

Block said, however, that social media became a “forum for misinformation” with rumors of multiple shooters in different locations. A task force is assessing how to improve UCLA’s responses to potential violence in the future. “Overall, the emergency response to the incident was successful, and the campus’ efforts to prepare for such emergencies proved helpful,” Block said.

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Appropriate Grade: Incomplete

One of the two parking kiosks servicing the parking area under the 100 building in the medical complex has been under construction for a long time. The result is frequent backups of cars seeking to exit. The sign says the construction was supposed to end in June. As of July 20, there is no sign of completion - and no evidence that anyone is embarrassed by having a sign saying it would occur by June. Just saying.

Bee's Hurt Feelings Continue

We noted yesterday that the Sacramento Bee got hold of a bunch of UC-Davis emails related to the Katehi affair.* Basically, the emails show a bunch of underlings trying to clean up the mess. But among the statements found was this rude insult to the Bee:

"We are the laughingstock of the world right now, and we’ve given a pathetic, dying newspaper a day in the sun,” added (Davis communications director Gary) Delsohn, a former Sacramento Bee reporter who also wrote speeches for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

So we now have an editorial that says even if the Regents adopt tighter ethics rules, Katehi has an innate problem:

...Rules aside, Katehi’s trouble with optics is a big part of the pickle her career is now in.**

You can agree with that assessment and still say, about the latest editorial and the previous article on the emails, that there is no NEW news here.
===

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Katehi Timeline

The Academic Senate of UC-Davis has released a timeline of the entire Katehi affair for those trying to keep track of it. You can find it at:
http://academicsenate.ucdavis.edu/local_resources/docs/whats_new_2016/ucd_chancellor_timelinefactsheet_6.21.16.pdf

Cautionary Note for the Regents

Profs. Matthew Malkan (UCLA-Astronomy) and John Ellis (UC-SC, Literature, Emeritus) have sent a letter to the Regents expressing concerns about the bylaw changes up for consideration at their meeting this week. Apart from the specifics of the changes, a summer meeting when faculty are not around, campus Academic Senates are effectively not functioning, etc., seems not the best time to do major governance changes. An excerpt from their letter is in italics below:

1. By-Laws should properly be amended paragraph by paragraph, with the rationale for each change carefully explained, and that explanation subject to public debate. When one entire set is to be replaced by another, what is essentially being demanded of every Regent is that they search out and compare the original and the replacement for every single provision, and consider carefully the rationale for each change. That is self-evidently impossible. It is both incompetent and irresponsible to ask each Regent to do something that cannot possibly be done. The By-Laws are the Regents’ constitution. They are far too important to be treated in this frivolous way.
2. If the By-Laws are the Board’s constitution, the Standing Orders are the record of its legislation. The distinction between these two utterly different kinds of documents is well understood in many different contexts. A proposal to abolish the one and incorporate it into the other can only rest on a failure to understand this fundamental difference. Nor can Standing Orders be replaced by “policies”. The Standing Orders are publicly available records of Regental decisions. They must remain so, and they are not By-Laws.
3. Many of the proposals enshrined in the new By-Laws seem to us extremely unwise, but in at least one case, it is also plainly illegal: Each Regent is appointed to the Board for a set term, and the power to appoint is vested by the state constitution in the Governor. The Board cannot suddenly vest in itself the power to determine the length of a particular Regent’s term. We are surprised that General Counsel did not warn the administration that this proposed By-Law would be null and void. If he missed something as obvious as this, what else did he miss in his scrutiny of the proposed changes
4. Two proposals appear inconsistent with the fundamental purpose of a Board of Regents. First, Regents are the interface between the University and the public.  Thus it has always been understood that any individual Regent must be free to raise a matter of public concern at a plenary meeting with minimal restrictions. The new By-Laws could stop that, and in so doing might change what it means to be a UC Regent. Second, it is proposed to establish what in effect would be a very small super-committee that would control much of what happens in the Board. Because the UC President would be one of its tiny number, this would change the relationship between the Board and the University administration: the President would be a much more dominant presence in a small group. This would not be a more efficient arrangement: it would be one in which the role of the Regents as watchdog over the University is seriously diminished.
5. Public statements so far do not identify the exact source of these proposals. It is natural to assume that it would have taken the considerable staff resources of the President’s office to produce so far reaching and complex a revision. If that is so—and  we do not see that it could be otherwise—then these proposals should have been accompanied by a clear statement from the President as to why she thinks that the major individual provisions she is suggesting are necessary. She should particularly address  those provisions that would seem to have the effect of consolidating more power in her office, and diluting the oversight function of the Regents.
We understand that severe criticism of these proposals has resulted in their being somewhat modified at the last minute. But modification is not enough: they are so fundamentally flawed that they should be dropped in their entirety.

Bee Insulted

The Sacramento Bee has a lengthy article about emails they obtained from UC-Davis concerning the affair surrounding now-suspended Chancellor Katehi. Basically, the emails are communications of university PR types trying to contain the damage. They don't say anything you wouldn't expect. But there is one insult to the Bee which may explain why the article appeared: hurt feelings on the part of the Bee:

"We are the laughingstock of the world right now, and we’ve given a pathetic, dying newspaper a day in the sun,” added (Davis communications director Gary) Delsohn, a former Sacramento Bee reporter who also wrote speeches for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Full story at http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/education/article90418047.html