The Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) has come out with summaries of the state budget prior to any line-item vetoes by the governor. Since the governor has a deal with the legislature, it is unlikely that there will be significant vetoes but we will wait to see. In the current year, reserves were falling, i.e., a deficit in common parlance (but not necessarily in Sacramento-speak). However, in the coming year (2015-16), total reserves (regular plus rainy day) are projected to rise, i.e., a surplus.
The LAO summarizes the UC budget for 2015-6 as follows:
$3.2 Billion General Fund Support for UC. This
is an increase of $241 million (8 percent) from 2014-15. Of this
increase, $119 million is ongoing and $122 million is one time. The bulk
of the ongoing funding is unallocated, but the budget includes various
earmarks for the remaining funds. Specifically, the budget earmarks (1)
$96 million (one time) to supplement payments made by UC toward its
unfunded pension liability (this is counted as a Proposition 2 debt
payment),* (2) $25 million (one time) for deferred maintenance (provided
through a budget control section), (3) $6 million (ongoing) to support
two UC centers on labor research and education, (4) $1 million (one
time) for the Wildlife Health Center at the Davis campus to administer
grants to local marine mammal stranding networks, (5) up to $1 million
for UC to continue planning a medical school at the Merced campus, and
(6) $770,000 (ongoing) for an elections database housed at the Berkeley
campus. In addition, the budget specifies funding is available from UC’s
base budget for the California DREAM Loan Program, though it does not
designate a set dollar amount for this purpose.
Source: http://www.lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3275
Because revenue is now diverted to the rainy day fund under Prop 2, some adjustments have been made to the figures below for 2015-16 including adding back an "encumbrance" of $971 million:
($ billions)
Reserves at start of year: $4.0
Revenue and transfers
including received by
rainy day fund +$116.9
Expenditures -$115.4
Surplus +$1.5
Reserves at end of year $5.5
As we have noted in prior posts, at the end of the year total reserves would be less than 5% of the budget which could be eaten up quickly in any kind of downturn.
Source: http://www.lao.ca.gov/Publications/Report/3279
---
*This blog has previously noted that the language in the budget is not in accord with the Committee of Two accord which promises a multi-year inflow into the UC pension. Instead, there is a one-time allocation only for the first year with language - unless it has been changed - saying there is no guarantee of future contributions. The quid pro quo for the multi-year deal was creating a Tier 3 in the pension with a cap that will require substantial reworking of the pension program. Without even the quid pro quo, it is very difficult to see how UC benefits. See http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2015/06/unbalanced-pension-deal.html
1 comment:
Dan--
I just wanted to second your asterisk comment. The LAO is putting the most generous spin possible on the budget. After all, as I read the bill, the one-time pension money will only kick in after UC changes its pension system and even the extra money for additional students is also delayed. It will be interesting to see if the LAO attempts to suggest that there is too much money being given to higher ed.
Post a Comment