Pages

Saturday, August 3, 2024

Left Right

From the Chronicle of Higher Ed: If you ask professors about their politics, they’ll say one thing. But if you use a complex algorithm to predict their politics based on their social-media interactions — as a recent study did — it’ll say another.

By scraping the accounts of more than 4,000 faculty members at over 500 institutions, a forthcoming paper based on the study says that the professoriate’s political persuasions are more diverse than previous survey-based research would suggest. The paper, which will be published in The Review of Higher Education, a peer-reviewed journal, also points to polarization across the political spectrum, arguing that professors’ true beliefs are more extreme and varied than widely thought.

The findings come as many conservative policymakers have sought to rein in a perceived left-leaning bias in academe, often drumming up fear over suspected liberal indoctrination. The authors of the study argue that those claims are exaggerations, and hope the paper will give academics some “firepower” to push back on those characterizations.

While conservative faculty members remain a minority, the study finds far more of them than previous research did, with over 13 percent categorized as strongly right-leaning. A major survey-based study in 2013 found that around 9 percent of professors identified as strongly conservative.

Some of the new study’s other findings, though, back up long-established trends: Tenured faculty members are more conservative than junior scholars are, and there are major ideological disparities between disciplines. Business professors and economists, for example, are often very conservative; the humanities and some sociology subfields, meanwhile, are “decidedly liberal.”

The larger share of conservative scholars found in the study could be a product of its contemporary methodology, rather than actual changes in beliefs, said its lead author, Nicholas Havey, who began the research when he was getting his Ph.D. in computational social science at the University of California at [sic] Los Angeles. Havey is now the American Association of Colleges of Nursing’s director of institutional research.

Previous studies of faculty politics employed surveys in which professors categorized or described themselves. This study argues that those results could be inaccurate because of people’s warped perceptions of their own politics or social pressures.

An older professor “might think they’re liberal compared to a goalpost they set 30 years prior, but that old goalpost now makes them far-right conservative,” Havey said. Or many professors may have misleadingly labeled themselves as moderate because “no one wants to think of themselves as inherently radical.” The 2013 study found around half of professors identified as moderate; this one says only about 15 percent actually are...

Full article at https://www.chronicle.com/article/actually-there-are-more-conservatives-on-the-faculty-than-you-think-study-finds.

Friday, August 2, 2024

End of an Era: A Transition Begins - Part 2

Posted 8-2-2024
https://x.com/bigten/status/1819424773765525708

 

We'll likely hear more about this

As faithful blog readers will know, the UC chief investments officer put $4.5 billion of pension and endowment monies in the Blackstone Real Estate Trust as a kind of bailout for the trust as it experienced a run on the bank. All of this was in search of a special UC extra-high rate of return in exchange for the bailout. 

It's unclear whether this return has actually been received; back in February we noted an article indicating that the extra return was a kind of IOU being carried by BREIT rather than an actual payout.* There have also been stories questioniing BREIT's valuation of its assets.**

This blog has focused primarily on the financial side of the story. At the Regents, there have been protests concerning the landlord-tenant side of BREIT investments. Now the LA Times has published an extensive review of public pension plan (including UC) investments in funds such as BREIT, largely from the landlord-tenant perspective: Do their investments raise rents in California?

The article is quite lengthy. You can find it at:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-08-01/to-help-the-middle-class-retire-public-pensions-are-driving-gentrification-critics-say. Excerpt:

"The data tracked by The Times covers rent for available units and thus show an increase in housing costs for people looking for a new place to live. Several tenants also told The Times their rent climbed faster once the pension-linked funds in The Times’ analysis took over."

Basically, the article describes a strategy of funds such as BREIT, using in part investments from public pension funds, of buying older buildings, doing some refurbishing which upscales them, and then raising rents. The funds respond that rents are rising because of low rates of new construction.

In any case, we may see renewed complaints at the Regents from tenants in response to the article.

===

*https://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2024/02/does-this-make-you-nervous.html.

**https://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2024/05/maybe-outlook-isnt-so-breit.html. Using the search option for "BREIT" on this blog will bring up other related stories.
 

Legislative Suggestions?

The following request was circulated by an academic department:

The UC Office of State Governmental Relations (SGR) would like to solicit your ideas for issues that may require legislation sponsored by the University in 2025. Although the number of legislative proposals in any given year that SGR can accommodate as sponsored legislation is limited, we would like to encourage you to submit proposals for changes to state law that may be necessary or desirable as they relate to University programs, activities or existing statute. 

When considering whether to submit a legislative proposal, keep in mind that proposals with significant fiscal costs or implications to the University face unique obstacles as they may compete with the University’s annual State Budget Request. So, we encourage legislative proposals to not have fiscal costs if possible. 

Suggestions can be made at:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSel63WltdeyCySo57rYH4gFxzpPcD3o75HZqemA9yYKGEzUwA/viewform.

Thursday, August 1, 2024

End of an Era: A Transition Begins


Posted 7-31-2024
Source: https://x.com/UCLAchancellor/status/1818772953930317882.

Getting In

UCOP has released data on new admissions for fall 2024. Note that an applicant who is admitted may or may not accept and appear in the fall. That is, actual enrollment may differ from admissions.

...Overall, the University admitted a record 166,706 students (137,200 first-year and 29,506 transfer students). This included 93,920 first-year admission offers to California students, up 4.3 percent (3,867) from last year. This represents an all-time high for the number of California first-years admitted in a single year and is up more than 31,400 over 2014.

The admission rate for first-year California residents increased from 68 percent last year to 70 percent this year. UC is poised to enroll more California undergraduates than ever, building on systemwide progress toward the shared enrollment goals outlined in the budget compact with the state...

Source: https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/press-room/university-california-breaks-admissions-records-surges-california-and-underrepresented.

Below are two of several tables that accompany the release above:




Doing the Math

The legislature is always pushing to ease the transfer process between community colleges and UC. At the same time, we have the ongoing controversy about math requirements to enter UC as a freshman. As it happens, there is a Senate document under review concerning proposed transfer requirements. Below is a sampling of what UC would like transfer students to have in the way of math in various STEM fields. 

The proposed Pathway in Chemical Engineering will consist of the following courses:

• Calculus-based physics (full sequence with lab)

• Single-variable calculus (full sequence)

• Multivariable calculus (one semester course)

• Linear Algebra (one course)

• Differential Equations (one course)

• General Chemistry (full sequence with lab)

• Organic Chemistry (full sequence with lab)

• A programming course (MATLAB is recommended) (one semester)

=====

The proposed Pathway in Data Science will consist of the following courses:

• An introductory course in data science/statistics

• A two-course sequence in single-variable calculus

• Multivariable calculus

• Linear Algebra

• At least two courses in computer programming 

=====

The proposed Pathway in Statistics will consist of the following courses:

• An introductory course in data science/statistics

• A two-course sequence in single-variable calculus

• Multivariable calculus

• Linear Algebra

• Differential Equations

=====

The proposed Pathway in Aerospace Engineering will consist of the following courses:

• Calculus-based physics (full sequence with lab)

• Single-variable calculus (full sequence)

• Multivariable Calculus

• Linear Algebra

• Differential Equations

• General Chemistry (full sequence with lab)

• Materials

• Statics

• Circuits

=====

The proposed Pathway in Environmental Science will consist of the following courses:

• Calculus-based physics (full sequence with lab)

• Introductory Biology (full sequence with lab)

• Single-variable calculus (full sequence)

• General Chemistry (full sequence with lab)

• Introductory Statistics course

• Principles of Economics (microeconomics)

• One semester of Organic Chemistry

=====

Source: https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/reports/js-yg-new-uc-transfer-pathways.pdf.