- The lack of consultation for implementing the Information Security Investment Plan and the potential negative effects of the plan on faculty’s research, teaching, and merits and promotions.
- UCOP’s differential treatment of faculty and administrators regarding compensation and cost-of-living adjustments.
- The University of California’s continued decrease in percent contribution to medical plans.
When you look at the petition (attached to the meeting agenda), you find the names and campuses of those who called for the special session.** Represented among the petitioners are Davis, Irvine, Berkeley, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, and Riverside. Merced, Santa Cruz, and UCLA are not represented. So, that does mean that at UCLA in particular, nobody was particularly concerned with at least one of the three issues? Is UCLA somehow out of the loop? Just asking...
It might be noted that yours truly became aware of this matter after being forwarded an announcement from UC-Irvine's Senate, not from the UCLA Senate.
NOTE: I notified the UCLA Senate about the upcoming systemwide meeting on Jan. 13.
==
*https://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2025/01/somethings-happening.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment