There are lots of ways of calculating regional multipliers of jobs and spending. But, especially at the sub-national level, there are some cautionary notes that are usually omitted or under-emphasized in such exercises. Typically, regardless of methodology, the multiplier at the sub-national level comes out to something like 2 or 3, i.e., for every job created in sector X directly, there is a total of 2 to 3 jobs created because of indirect multiplier effects. Now let X = UC.
As I have pointed out in a class I teach, if you added all sectors of the California economy together and compute and add up each one's direct+indirect effects, there must be 2 to 3 times as many people who work in California as work in California. If that sentence leaves you puzzled, you can begin to see the problem of pushing the multiplier approach.
So it isn't the report that yours truly would have written. Nonetheless, I am duty-bound to give you a link to the report which you can find at:
No comments:
Post a Comment