Pages

Thursday, April 2, 2026

Straws in the Wind - Part 300

From The Atlantic: The events of the past three months seem almost perfectly engineered to spark campus unrest. In January, mass-deportation operations led to the brazen killing of U.S. citizens at the hands of masked immigration agents. In February, the Environmental Protection Agency declared that it would no longer regulate greenhouse-gas emissions. A few weeks later, the Trump administration joined forces with Israel to launch an attack on Iran without congressional approval. One might expect left-leaning college students to have practically started a revolution.

But campuses across the country—places where, just two years ago, students occupied buildings and colonized the quad to protest Israel’s war against Hamas—are strangely silent. These days, those same students mostly head to class. The extent of the change is jarring. David Sengthay, a Stanford senior and the head of the undergraduate-student senate, told me that protests typified the university’s history, up to and including his first two years in Palo Alto. But by the time he returned as a junior, in fall 2024, something was different...

Sengthay said that he and other Stanford students had envisioned college as a “playground for free speech and democracy” before the greater responsibilities and pressures of adult life. They’ve since discovered that the rules of the game have changed.

Full story at https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/campus-protests-trump-iran/686518/.

Will Harvard Continue to Lead the Charge? - Part 136

From the Harvard Crimson: Harvard will attempt to issue $675 million in tax-exempt bonds — its third major debt sale in just over a year — according to a preliminary official statement released [last] Friday. The bond sale comes as Harvard faces a turbulent financial landscape and mounting financial pressure from the federal government. The University reported an operating loss of $113 million last year — its first budget deficit since the pandemic — a 1.7 percent operating shortfall on $6.7 billion in total revenue and a sharp reversal from the previous year’s $45 million surplus.

The preliminary statement acknowledges the Trump administration’s decision to halt billions in research funding, as well as an increased endowment tax projected to cost the University roughly $200 million annually. “While the financial impact on the University resulting from the totality of potential developments at the federal level cannot be quantified at this time, any such developments may, directly or indirectly, have a material adverse effect on the current and future financial profile and operating performance of the University,” the statement reads...

Full story at https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2026/3/30/bond-sale-750m-2026/.

Half & Half (and Half)

From an article in the LA Times describing a survey at CSU concerning the use and effect of AI:

...Faculty members are... split. The study says “56% report a positive effect on their teaching and research, and 52% report a negative effect. Faculty are the only group in the survey where a majority report both.”

Still, more than half of the faculty, 55%, said they use AI to develop course materials...

Full story at https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-04-01/csu-ai-survey-students-faculty.

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

He ain't here... (for budget explanations) - Part 5 - But we know where he is

As blog readers will know, we have been following UCLA's budget drama and the quick firing of CFO Agostini for saying that prior to his arrival, UCLA's financials were misleading due to mismanagement. As blog readers will further know, Agostini did leave a kind of legacy, a budget book with his version of the numbers. And finally, also knowledge of faithful blog readers, uncertain definitions of data and words such as "deficit" - along with absence of reserve data - make interpretation of budget information difficult.

But, although Agostini ain't here, we do know where he is. From the Daily Bruin:

UCLA’s former chief financial officer, who abruptly departed the university in February after alleging financial mismanagement, will serve as Culver City’s CFO... Agostini – who previously worked as a CFO in several federal government offices and was the associate vice chancellor of finance and budget at the University of North Carolina – said in the interview that he rarely saw financial mismanagement as extreme as UCLA’s...

The city lauded Agostini in the press release for closing a $300 million budget gap at UCLA and delivered a balanced budget. The release did not mention UCLA’s current budgetary deficit...

Full story at https://dailybruin.com/2026/03/31/former-ucla-cfo-stephen-agostini-to-serve-as-culver-citys-cfo.

---

Of course, it's not clear what the $300 million "gap" at UCLA refers to. And our interim CFO will be surprised (pleased? excited?) to know that UCLA budget is now "balanced."

In any case, dear reader, fear not! We are not done with our analysis of the info Agostini left us. Stay tuned!

Bond - Part 2

Bill to place a $23 billion bond to fund scientific research in California on the November ballot clears Senate Health Committee

UC Office of the President

University of California-sponsored legislation, SB 895 by Senator Scott Wiener, passed the Senate Health Committee on a 9-2 vote... March 25. As UC faces one of the most significant disruptions to its research enterprise in its 158-year history, this bipartisan legislation would place a $23 billion bond to fund scientific research across California on the November 2026 ballot. If passed by voters, the measure would help preserve research central to protecting jobs, sustaining lifesaving medical advancements, supporting the health of California communities and maintaining the state’s global leadership in innovation.

“In all my time at UC, I have never seen a more precarious situation for scientific research and greater challenges to our economy, our workforce development, and most importantly our public health,” Kim Elaine Barrett, Ph.D., vice dean for Research at the UC Davis School of Medicine, said at yesterday’s hearing. “Research at UC generates as much as $55.2 billion in economic activity every year — medical breakthroughs alone generate approximately $13 billion in economic activity across California. California has been a leader in scientific inquiry and should invest in its ability to protect jobs, health care, and the economic future of our state.”

Prior to the hearing, over five dozen letters from researchers and faculty were submitted on behalf of the University and over 2,500 emails were sent to lawmakers in support of SB 895 and the critical research funding the bill would provide...

Full news release at https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/press-room/bill-place-23-billion-bond-fund-scientific-research-california-november-ballot-clears.

Straws in the Wind - Part 299

From the NY Times: Boston University removed Pride flags that were displayed in campus buildings this month, angering professors who believe school leaders may be suppressing expression because they fear the Trump administration. University officials have suggested the displays could imply the school endorses them, violating its pledge to be evenhanded with its standards around speech. The university’s decision is a new skirmish in academia about campus expression, and it comes after more schools across the country embraced so-called neutrality policies, curbing the views they express publicly. Universities have also imposed more stringent limits on protests in the years since demonstrations over the war in Gaza rocked campuses.

But the debate in Boston involves flags, not encampments. According to the university’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors, the school temporarily removed at least three Pride flags, including one belonging to the Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies Program. That one was taken down and folded neatly during spring break.

...The First Amendment’s speech protections on their own do not apply at the private university, giving campus leaders more authority than some of their counterparts to determine what may be displayed on school property. The university said in a statement that it “upholds a content-neutral policy” around campus expression and that “outward-facing signage moves speech from an individual perspective to an institutional perspective.” ...

Full story at https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/us/boston-university-pride-flags-free-speech.html.

No, you were not invited

The Regents had another 30-minute, closed-door meeting yesterday about you-know-what:

TO THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA:

Because the membership of the Advisory Group on Research and Programs Funding Legal Issues (“Advisory Group”) includes five members of the Regents’ Governance Committee, there exists the potential for having present a quorum of a Regents’ Committee when the advisory committee meets.

This notice of meeting is served in order to comply fully with pertinent open meeting laws.

On Tuesday, March 31, 2026, there will be a Closed Session, Special Meeting of the Regents’ Governance Committee concurrent with the Advisory Group to discuss Research and Programs Funding Legal Issues (Closed Session Statute Citation: Litigation [Education Code section 92032(b)(5)].)

The meeting will convene at 4:00 p.m. at 1111 Franklin Street, Oakland and adjourn at approximately 4:30 p.m.

(Advisory Group members: Regents Anguiano, Cohen, Hernandez, Matosantos, Milliken, Reilly, Robinson, Sarris, and Sures)

Source: https://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/mar26/federal_meeting_march-31-2026.pdf.