Pages

Thursday, November 10, 2022

Student Strike News - Part 2

We have previously posted about an impending student worker strike, currently set to occur just before the Regents meet next week.* The UCLA Academic Senate sent out the notice below yesterday. Below that you will find an editorial on the planned strike from the Los Angeles Times.

----

To: Academic Senate Faculty

Dear Colleagues:

We are writing to update faculty on issues related to the UAW strike called for November 14, 2022.

First, some background. The strike includes four bargaining units comprised of academic appointees: 1) Academic Student Employees (TAs/Readers/Tutors); 2) Postdoctoral Scholars; 3) Academic Researchers (Specialists/Project Scientists/Professional Researchers); and 4) Graduate Student Researchers (GSRs, including some on training grants and external fellowships). The University of California’s contracts with several of these groups expired on October 31, and the first GSR contract is under negotiation. The UAW membership conducted a strike authorization vote that ended November 2, and the large majority of members voted to authorize a strike. The university Administration and the union are negotiating the four contracts.

The Academic Senate and faculty are not involved in the negotiations between the University of California Administration and the union.

The Academic Senate, in advancing the academic mission of teaching, research, and service, supports the learning and well-being of all students, graduate and undergraduate, as well as trainees. Graduate students play an essential role in research and teaching at the University of California, and the Academic Senate has recognized that the current graduate funding model is broken. We also support Senate members as we faculty navigate a possible strike that will affect both our teaching and our research.

Faculty are raising many questions about the strike, including whether to perform struck work and whether they have the right not to cross picket lines. It is imperative that faculty have flexibility in how they respond to the strike. Faculty must not be expected to take on additional labor if they choose not to do so.

At the intersection of research with education, a GSR strike at UCLA is unprecedented. It raises challenging questions about how to assess student research that is conducted for course credits and also as GSR labor. We sought clarification from the Office of the President of the University of California about options available to faculty, and we hope to convey their answers in the days to come.

For faculty who ask how to manage disruption to instruction, there is no one-size-fits-all response given the diversity of instruction on our campus. Faculty possess customary discretion and autonomy to adapt their courses to strike circumstances while honoring Academic Senate regulations. At this time changes to those regulations are not anticipated, though a lengthy strike would raise questions about regulations governing final exam format. About these and other strike-related matters, we welcome your input as we continue to work hard to find answers and solutions. We will keep you informed of any developments in the divisional or systemwide Academic Senate, and we urge you to communicate with enrolled students about change and continuity in your courses.

We are grateful for your commitment to our students and colleagues and to the academic mission, especially as we remain concerned about the pandemic’s heavy and uneven toll on faculty and recognize the acute need to address faculty workload, rebuilding, and renewal.

Jessica Cattelino, Chair, Academic Senate

Andrea Kasko, Vice Chair/Chair-Elect, Academic Senate

Shane White, Immediate Past Chair, Academic Senate

Kathy Bawn, Chair, Undergraduate Council

James Bisley, Chair, Graduate Council

----

From the LA Times editorial board, November 9, 2022:

A strike by UC academic workers would tarnish the prestigious university system

If the University of California and 48,000 academic workers fail to reach an agreement on pay increases and other benefits in the next few days it may tarnish a higher education system long seen as the best in the country.

With less than a month before final exams, communities at campuses across the UC system are nervously awaiting an agreement before Nov. 14. That’s when the workers, including teaching assistants, tutors, postdoctoral scholars and other academic employees, are prepared to strike, which means students would have to rely solely on professors for grades or one-on-one help. It’s an implosion that should have been averted long before now, considering that negotiations have been underway for more than a year.

The workers are represented by four bargaining units of the United Auto Workers and have banded together for more bargaining power. These workers, who say they do most of the teaching, grading and research, last week announced their membership authorized a statewide strike if UC doesn’t cease “unlawful conduct” by doing things such as making contract changes without first discussing them during negotiations. In response, UC maintains it is listening to these workers with a “genuine willingness to compromise” as shown by the tentative agreements on issues such as health and safety after more than 50 bargaining sessions.

Fair compensation has been the stickiest — and most important — demand on which UC and the four unions representing the workers have been unable to concur. The heart of the debate is whether these workers are earning enough to afford housing near campus, which can be outrageously expensive, particularly in Los Angeles, Berkeley, Irvine and Santa Cruz.

They have a point. The average teacher assistant salary is about $24,000, which is considerably less than median rent in Los Angeles. More than 92% of these workers are rent-burdened, a designation that means more than 30% of their salary is allocated for housing costs. Of these rent-burdened employees, about 40% use more than half of their salary on housing.

UC has offered pay increases during the multiyear contracts, ranging from 4% in the first year for academic researchers to 7% for academic student employees. The proposal included smaller raises in subsequent years to the different bargaining units, but workers rejected the offers, saying they don’t go far enough. There are other provisions on the bargaining table, including a child-care subsidy and transit passes, that will help ease affordability, but agreeing on adequate pay raises is key.

What does it say about a university system touted as one of the Golden State’s best attributes if its intellectual workforce can’t afford to live in the state? The UC system has long been considered among the finest in the country, with six of its campuses listed among the top 10 public universities in the United States in the U.S. News & World Report’s 2023 Best Colleges rankings.

It’s clear that UC administrators have tough budget choices to make. However, these academic workers play such a critical role and deserve to earn enough to pay for basic needs.

Source: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-11-09/la-ed-potential-strike-by-academic-workers-tarnishes-prestigious-university-system. 

----

*http://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2022/11/student-strike-news.html.

----

To hear the text above, click on the link below:

https://ia601402.us.archive.org/25/items/big-ten/planned%20student%20strike%20part%202.mp3

Wednesday, November 9, 2022

Stanford's Approach to the Big-10 Issue Seems Different from UCLA's

Apparently, at Stanford, the top leadership is talking to the Academic Senate - in public - about the implications of the UCLA and USC move to the Big Ten. Is anything like that happening at UCLA? If not, why not? From the Stanford Daily:

Confidential conversations are underway about the changing landscape of athletic conferences, the University president said at Thursday’s Faculty Senate meeting. Responding to a faculty senator’s question about conference realignment, University President Marc Tessier-Lavigne discussed how student athletes at UCLA and USC, which will both join the Big 10 Conference in 2024, would be affected by “much more travel.” He then said that these considerations were “very concerning to us as well as we look at this landscape.” Tessier-Lavigne confirmed that conversations about media rights are already ongoing within the Pac-12, after a recent lawsuit filed against the NCAA opened the possibility of student athletes monetizing their own brand.

“There is a lot that’s happening behind closed doors right now,” Tessier-Lavigne said. “I am not at liberty to divulge those except to say that the 10 universities are focused on working with our commissioner to strike a deal that would be good for the conference, but more importantly good for our student athletes.” At the same meeting, civil and environmental engineering professor Jeff Koseff, the faculty athletics representative, and Bernard Muir, athletics director, discussed the state of the University’s athletics program, including some of the significant challenges and changes facing collegiate athletics nationwide. Koseff said his role includes making sure athletes are able to participate fully in both their academic and athletic pursuits while at Stanford. He also works on NCAA compliance so that the athletes are always able to compete. 

“It’s a very big operation,” Koseff said. He said Stanford has 36 sports for scholarship, the second highest in the country after Ohio State, which has 37. Additionally, Stanford has 817 athletes, according to Koseff — which represents around 10% of the undergraduate population. Stanford is a national leader in intercollegiate athletics, Koseff said: “We have won more national championships and our graduation rates are the highest in the country. Our athletes graduate, they go out and they make an impact in society.” Koseff added, “Excellence in athletics is part and parcel of what defines Stanford. It’s part of our culture and our fabric.”

However, the financial overview revealed that the athletics department is running a financial loss. “The income and expenses do not match,” Koseff said. “It’s something that is actively being worked on.” Koseff pointed out that $40 million is derived from the Pac-12 through media rights and March Madness. This large sum “should be what drives a lot of decision-making going forward,” Koseff said. In terms of the national landscape, there are shifting allegiances. USC and UCLA left the Pac-12 to join the Big 10. The Pac-12 and the Big 10 are NCAA Division I athletic conferences. 

Since this move, conference realignment has been a topic of consideration among the Stanford administration, according to Koseff. Schools in the Big 10 make significantly more from media rights, which could result in “an extra $50 million,” Koseff said...

Full story at https://stanforddaily.com/2022/11/08/tessier-lavigne-says-conference-realignment-conversations-are-underway-at-faculty-senate-meeting/.

===

To hear the text above, click on the link below:

https://ia601402.us.archive.org/25/items/big-ten/stanford%20big%2010.mp3

Tuesday, November 8, 2022

Another Reminder of the Non-Newness of Remote Education

From The Radio in the Home, June-July 1926.

Plan B for Pac-12

According to one source, the Pac-12 has a Plan B regarding the loss of USC and UCLA. San Diego State could provide the Pac-12 with an alternative presence in southern California.

The Pac-12 could reportedly have a new member as early as this week 

San Diego State to the Pac-12 could happen as early as this week

Doug Samuels, 11-7-2022, Football Scoop

New Pac-12 commissioner George Kliavkoff had a lot on his plate as he took over the league heading into some serious media rights negotiations, and with huge departures of USC and UCLA (at least for now) to the Big Ten. With talks picking up between the league and San Diego State over the past week or so, [sports commentator] Dan Patrick shared on air this morning that the Aztecs are expected to join the Pac-12 and an announcement could come as early as this week. Earlier on in conference expansion discussions, the Big 12 was also rumored to be interested in adding the Aztecs. Adding SDSU not only brings them into the Power Five, but for the Pac-12 it means maintaining a much-needed southern California presence for the league. The Aztecs just built a 35,000 seat stadium, that has the capacity to expand to 50,000 relatively easily and their men's basketball and baseball programs come in as an immediate asset to the league...

Full story at https://footballscoop.com/news/the-pac-12-could-reportedly-have-a-new-member-as-early-as-this-week.

Note that having a Plan B might be seen as a negotiating strategy. In effect, the Pac-12 is saying to the UC Regents that UCLA (and, for that matter, USC) can be replaced. Or it could just be a Plan B. How the Regents might respond remains to be seen. So, as we have noted in prior postings, let's wait and see.

===

To hear the text above, click on the link below:

https://ia601402.us.archive.org/25/items/big-ten/plan%20b.mp3

Election Day

Today is Election Day. For your political pleasure, yours truly has gathered up video and audio recordings featuring Governor Newsom - who hardly campaigned for reelection since the statewide Republican Party is very weak - but he actually did have a GOP opponent, Brian Dahle. 

The last few gubernatorial elections have come out roughly 6-to-4 in favor of the Democratic candidate. About a quarter of registered voters in California are Republicans. They, plus some independents and disaffected Democrats, have ended up producing about 40% of the vote, with the rest going to the Democrat, including in last year's attempted recall of the governor.

Below you will find links to video highlights related to the gubernatorial race, the race for mayor of Los Angeles, two rival tribal gambling propositions, and an election that never occurred: the attempted recall of the Los Angeles district attorney. Political junkies will know that in San Francisco, unlike in LA, the district attorney there was recalled.

==================

Here is how Governor Newsom presented himself during 2022 including some Dahle ads and related material:

Governor:

Briefings: California Gov. Gavin Newsom - Nov.-Dec. 2022 [More will be added as we finish the calendar year.]

https://archive.org/details/newsom-11-3-22-oil-profits

---

Briefings: California Gov. Gavin Newsom Sept.-Oct. 2022

https://archive.org/details/newsom-9-1-22-heat-wave

---

Briefings: California Gov. Gavin Newsom, July-August 2022

https://archive.org/details/newsom-7-1-22-guns

---

Briefings: California Gov. Gavin Newsom, May-June 2022

https://archive.org/details/newsom-5-1-22-ad-redwoods

---

Briefings: California Gov. Newsom - March-April 2022

https://archive.org/details/newsom-3-3-22-behaviorial-health

---

Coronavirus-Other Briefings: California Gov. Gavin Newsom - January-February 2022

https://archive.org/details/covid-tests-arriving-for-schools-1-4-2022-short

---

Propositions:

Tribal Gambling On the California Ballot: 2022

https://archive.org/details/false-attacks

==================
The Los Angeles 2022 Mayoral Contest


==================

Finally, there was an election that never took place, the recall of LA District Attorney George Gascón. His opponents never collected sufficient signatures to get a recall on the ballot:

Failed Recall Effort: Los Angeles DA George Gascón

==================
To hear the text above, click on the link below:

Monday, November 7, 2022

DACA Hiring?

We noted in the prior post that the UC Regents, when they meet next week, are likely to hear in public comments about collective bargaining demands of student workers. They are also likely to hear about a proposal to have UC hire DACA students. Indeed, they already have heard about it. From the UC-San Diego Guardian:

A coalition of students have launched a new campaign, Opportunity for All, alongside a letter addressed to UC President Michael V. Drake, urging him to implement a system to hire undocumented students in UC campuses, under the premise and legal review of federal laws which they insist does not apply to the UC system. The letter asserts that the 1986 law, the Immigration Reform & Control Act, that made it illegal to hire undocumented people knowingly does not mention states, thereby making it inapplicable. Legal experts undersigning the letter have interpreted this so that the law does not bind state government entities — including the UC — since it falls out of line with past Supreme Court precedents that explicitly mention states in federal law. “Because the University of California is an arm of the state, it faces no legal restriction on hiring undocumented workers. This reading of the 1986 law has now been endorsed by [twenty-eight] of the most knowledgeable immigration law professors in the country,” the letter reads.

The letter has been signed by several prominent law professors from UCLA School of Law, UC Berkeley School of Law, and Stanford Law. While it’s unclear whether the UC Regents will respond to this proposal, Chair of the UC Board of Regents Richard Leib told the Los Angeles Times that he is intrigued by the legal proposal, given that it is signed by notable scholars, such as UC Berkeley’s School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky. “It’s a brand-new novel idea, and of course, I would love to do it if feasible,” Leib said. “But I want to review it closely, so it doesn’t have any unintended consequences and doesn’t end up hurting our undocumented students.” ...

Full story at https://ucsdguardian.org/2022/11/06/uc-students-and-scholars-urge-uc-to-hire-undocumented-students-without-work-permits/.

===

To hear the text above, click on the link below:

 https://ia601402.us.archive.org/25/items/big-ten/daca%20hiring.mp3

Student Strike News

A strike by student workers at UC is planned for just before the Regents meet next week. The timing is likely not coincidental. From the San Francisco Chronicle:

Nearly 50,000 University of California student workers — researchers, postdocs, teaching assistants and graders — said Thursday they will strike on Nov. 14, an action that threatens to hobble UC campuses and laboratories up and down the state ahead of next month’s final exams. The frustrated employees voted by a 98% margin — 35,654 to 904 — [last] Wednesday to strike over pay and what they called UC’s unfair labor tactics. The labor action is expected to be open-ended...

Although UC’s Office of the President expressed confidence that instruction and research would continue seamlessly during the strike, individual campuses acknowledged that large-scale walkouts would be tough, with classes having to be canceled if all of the union members left work. Even with lower participation, some research labs are likely to have to close for safety if there aren’t enough people to staff them. Also, if the strike overlaps with finals, “it would be challenging,” said UC Berkeley spokesperson Janet Gilmore. “Our undergraduates depend on our graduate students to provide feedback on their work and/or assistance understanding course material,” so a disruption could be hardest on those students. Gilmore said it was likely the campus would tap faculty to step in and support undergrads and make sure their grades are posted on time.

Compensation is a key sticking point in the labor dispute... 

The 48,000 mostly student employees are represented by the UAW, the United Auto Workers union, whose full name is the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America. But there are no autoworkers in the UC action.

Instead, there are four groups of academics bargaining for separate contracts with the university:

• Local 2865 includes 19,000 teaching assistants, tutors and graduate students who teach and grade papers.

• Another 17,000 student researchers don’t yet have a local number because they haven’t negotiated a contract with UC since joining the union last year... 

• Local 5810 has two bargaining units, including 5,000 academic researchers — such as those at UCSF who study diseases — and 7,000 postdoctoral researchers who have been negotiating with UC for a year.

No healthcare workers are represented, and UC’s medical centers will remain open during a strike. The UAW has filed 20 unfair labor practice claims against the university, accusing UC of unilaterally changing pay and benefits, and withholding information it was required to disclose...

Full story at https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Thousands-vote-to-strike-across-UC-system-The-17554377.php.

Note that the filing of unfair labor practice charges - if the charges are upheld by the California Public Employment Relations Board - provides certain legal protections to strikers.

===

To hear the text above, click on the link below:

https://ia601402.us.archive.org/25/items/big-ten/planned%20student%20strike.mp3