We have two summaries below of what the Regents did on the 17th. The audio recording link is at the bottom of this post. Note that the official recording cuts off before the end of the session, so ours is also cut off. (The problem of early cutoffs of recordings seems to have affected some the recordings on the 16th, too.)
===
Student adviser position discontinued at 3rd day of UC regents meeting
By Mallika Seshadri | Daily Californian | 1-18-19
The UC Board of Regents ended the pilot program for the position of student adviser at Thursday’s meeting, held at UCSF Mission Bay. The board also called for increased collaboration between the UC Office of the President, or UCOP, and individual campuses.
“(The motion to eliminate the student adviser position) drives more student participation into the normal board governance … as opposed to an isolated student at the table,” said UC President Janet Napolitano at the meeting, while expressing appreciation for the contributions of both former student advisers.
The student adviser role, a position that provided the regents with student input, was approved in 2016 as a pilot program. Now, the UC has decided to end the program, leaving students with two options for future participation within the UC regent system.
One of these options is through the Student Advocates to the Regents program, which allows students to attend meetings and participate in public comment. The other is through student observer positions, which allow students to make statements to the board.
Napolitano, who was in favor of the motion to end the student adviser position, said the older programs allow more students to participate. Only 19 students applied to be student advisers, according to Edward Huang, the current student adviser and a UC Berkeley senior.
According to Regent George Kieffer, the chair of the board, each UC campus was surveyed in late 2017 for the “University of California 10 Campus Study,” which he referenced as “one of the most important things to happen in the last 18 months.”
Napolitano said that while the report did not provide a complete depiction of each campuses’ needs, it did identify the essence of the relationship between the UCOP and individual UC campuses.
“The effort has allowed us to improve collaboration and coordination between the campuses and the office of the president,” Napolitano said during the meeting. “And our goal is to promote a culture of continuous progress, continuous improvement — always necessary in an organization as diverse, as large, as the University of California.”
Each comment of the study has been discussed, and the whole document has been reviewed for potential areas of improvement over the past five months, according to Napolitano.
According to UC Berkeley Chancellor Carol Christ, this kind of assessment is important. Because each UC is its own research institution — rather than one university with several satellite campuses — many logistical challenges arise with respect to delegating power. When UC Berkeley was the only UC, it had one president who held all power. Eventually, more UCs were created.
Christ added that while the organization of the system is complex, it is a defining feature in the system’s governance, with both “opportunities and challenges.”
Source: http://www.dailycal.org/2019/01/18/student-adviser-position-discontinued-at-3rd-day-of-uc-regents-meeting/
===
UC regents relax rules restricting paid outside jobs for chancellors and top managers
By Teresa Watanabe, Jan. 17, 2019 | LA Times
University of California regents voted Thursday to weaken the rules for allowing chancellors and other senior managers to engage in outside professional activities, two years after cracking down on former UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi for moonlighting.
UC rules had required pre-approval for all paid and unpaid activities. But before wrapping up a two-day meeting in San Francisco, regents agreed to drop requirements for pre-approval for any outside activity — such as a position on a corporate board — that pays less than $2,500 from a single source in a year, unless required by a higher-up.
But senior managers, a group that includes about 290 people, still will be required to report all outside professional activities, both paid and unpaid.
After Katehi was ousted in 2016 over revelations that she had accepted paid positions with a for-profit education company and a textbook publisher, regents voted to decrease from three to two the number of paid for-profit board seats senior managers can accept. They also created an extra layer of approval for outside activities, as well as an independent review committee to assess any real or perceived conflicts of interest and potential damage to the reputation of a campus or UC.
But chancellors soon complained that the approval process had turned into a bureaucratic nightmare.
UC Berkeley Chancellor Carol Christ said it often took two months to get pre-approvals for her unpaid speeches to the Rotary Club, for instance, or royalties for work editing an anthology of British literature. Another chancellor who wrote an acclaimed book on free speech was told he should have received pre-approval for the project, Christ said.
“I'm sure the policy wasn't intended to create these incredibly burdensome and bureaucratic reporting requirements,” she said in interview. “Nobody has any problem whatsoever with there being strict scrutiny of service on for-profit boards or for-profit activities.”
Scholarly work will no longer be subject to the UC policy.
Christ called the changes that were approved Thursday “common-sense reforms.”
Other rules, including the limit of holding two paid positions on for-profit boards, remain in place. Exceptions must be approved by regents.
In 2017, four of 10 chancellors reported payments for outside professional activities: Pradeep Khosla at UC San Diego was paid $52,500, Christ at Berkeley received $1,500 and Samuel Hawgood at UC San Francisco got $1,000. UC Davis Chancellor Gary May reported $255,420 in cash and stocks from one corporation and one nonprofit, but much of it was earned in a previous job before joining UC in August 2017.
Board of Regents Chairman George Kieffer said UC’s moonlighting rules remain among the strictest in the nation.
The policy encourages its senior managers to serve on scientific boards, foundations and corporations as a way to share their expertise and learn about other administrative and educational operations.
But regents passed the stricter rules in 2016, after disclosures by the Sacramento Bee that Katehi had taken paid board positions with the DeVry Education Group, which was under federal investigation at the time for fraud, and John Wiley & Sons, a college textbook publisher. The revelations prompted both a state legislative hearing on UC moonlighting and a directive in the state budget to review and adjust policies on outside activities at UC.
Also Thursday, regents voted to phase out the board position of student advisor and instead add other opportunities for students to get involved with decision-making at UC. The position was established two years ago on a pilot basis and had been set to expire in July.
Student advisor Edward Huang pushed to keep the position, saying it would ensure more diversity and amplify student engagement with the Board of Regents. But Student Regent Devon Graves and Caroline Siegel Singh, president of the UC Student Assn., said the advisor position had not worked out as hoped and backed alternative approaches.
In other action, regents discussed a multiyear plan to boost enrollment, improve graduation rates and eliminate achievement gaps among students who are low-income, underrepresented minorities or the first in their families to attend college.
UC campuses are aiming to hit a 90% graduation rate within six years for freshmen and within four years for transfer students by 2030. However, some regents pushed UC officials to try to achieve that rate among all freshmen within four years.
Regents also discussed Gov. Gavin Newsom’s proposed budget, saying they hoped to secure more funding to enroll an additional 2,500 Californians in 2019-20.
Source: https://www.latimes.com/local/education/la-me-edu-uc-regents-budget-20190117-story.html
===
Audio link below:
Or direct to:
https://archive.org/details/RegentsFullBoard11719
No comments:
Post a Comment