Pages

Thursday, November 10, 2016

Priorities

From the Daily Bruin:

Flexitarians of UCLA: Rejoice, for there is a new flexitarian bar opening at De Neve dining hall next quarter.

Finally, you can live your life the way you’ve always imagined and realize your true destiny. Your academic dreams will come to fruition, and all the while, you can enjoy a diet of mostly plant-based protein, with a little meat and fish sprinkled here and there.

This truly unnecessary measure is just the newest in a series of efforts by UCLA and other colleges to market their facilities and hospitality services while ignoring underlying educational concerns. The new flexitarian bar demonstrates how UCLA has gone from marketing its school as an institution of superior academics to a summer camp with the country’s highest-ranked dorm food and all-new and improved dorms.

Meanwhile, as UCLA’s student population increases each year, class sizes grow and the student-faculty ratio worsens. More of UCLA’s efforts need to go toward improving its academic departments and facilities rather than toward turning the Hill into a student hotel.

And it’s not just in regards to food. The 2015 UCLA Viewbook boasts a campus “adorned” with “sparkling pools, tennis courts, state-of-the-art fitness centers and palm-tree-lined vistas.” There is a new quick dining service opening winter quarter, a graduate fitness center opening next summer, and a new outdoor study space was just recently opened near Powell. In short, the addition of the flexitarian bar is not the first time UCLA has hid behind its state-of-the-art facilities, marketing itself as a glorified hotel rather than an institution of higher learning.

In fact, for the 2014-2015 fiscal year, expenditures on residence halls amounted to $137,772,000, which is more than what was spent on the business and management, psychology, nursing, and architectural and environmental design departments combined.

Though there are many die-hard Bruin Plate fans on the Hill, I doubt any of us have any intention of becoming Van Wilder. Class enrollment issues, as well as the difficulty students have encountered in looking for solutions to these issues, have severely disillusioned us to the “let there be light” and “we the optimists” vibe that UCLA sold to us when we committed here.

With a rising student population, the student-faculty ratio will only continue to get worse. The student-faculty ratio has deteriorated to 17:1, and class sizes are so large that many students feel intimidated and unable to build a teacher-student relationship – a relationship that is imperative to getting recommendation letters in the future. If the trends keep up, faculty will become less and less accessible, along with the great resources that UCLA prides itself on, like the Academic Advancement Program and Campus Academic Counseling. Bottom line: There will be more students but less opportunity.

I’m not saying that the money spent on dining should be spent on academics – that’s not how the funding rules work. But this isn’t the Beverly Hills Hotel. Instead of trying to entice tenants for its year-long lease, perhaps UCLA should focus more on its academics – and I mean more than listing its impressive alumni or talking about how the global city of Los Angeles is our oyster or going over its position on arbitrary college ranking lists. Advertising things like Diddy Riese as a perk of UCLA will not help students get the education they deserve and pay for.

UCLA should be seeking to fund and improve its individual academic programs. For example, the administration should undertake short-term fundraising efforts for these departments in the same vein as they do for building new athletic facilities. It can be a very effective way to raise the money we need to help maintain our world-famous academic programs.

It may sound like I don’t appreciate the facilities my school has given me. Don’t get me wrong; I love the Bruin Fitness Center. I love Bruin Plate. I love bragging to my friends from home about my dining halls. But they’re not why I’m here.

I spend more time stressing about myUCLA not working, or CCLE being down or, most importantly, not being able to get into the classes I need to graduate. Adding high-end services is not enough to mask the underlying educational issues present on campus, and students aren’t going to stop asking for better academic services and support just because we have a new gym.

While we’re at this beautiful school with state-of-the-art gyms and the “best” college food in the country, it’s easy to forget the real reason why we come here: to get an education. UCLA should not forget this, nor should hopeful students. It is imperative UCLA focuses on marketing its academics rather than just putting the dorm food on display. Prospective students are extremely susceptible to falling victim to this type of propaganda, and these students should be able to make the best decision for themselves based on academics, first and foremost, amongst other things.

Let us not forget why we came here, or what makes UCLA so great in the first place.

Karishma Daibee

Source: http://dailybruin.com/2016/11/09/karishma-daibee-ucla-must-stop-marketing-campus-hospitality-over-educational-concerns/

1 comment:

gasstationwithoutpumps said...

According to http://accountability.universityofcalifornia.edu/2015/chapters/chapter-8.html the system-wide ratio is almost 21:1, so UCLA is far more privileged in terms of number of faculty than other campuses (UCB is also at 17:1). I think this results from the imbalance in funding to the campuses, which has been made more inequitable by rebenching (rather than less).

Several of the campuses are at 19:1 and Riverside is at 22:1.

I agree that UC needs to put more resources into faculty, but UCLA and UCB are the campuses in least need of this help.