Top 20 Universities Receiving NIH Grants (2023)
---
Johns Hopkins University $842,956,584
University of California, San Francisco $789,196,651
University of Pennsylvania $703,217,343
Duke University $701,940,461
University of Michigan $698,264,076
University of Pittsburgh $658,312,303
Washington University, St. Louis $633,343,121
Columbia University Health Sciences $633,309,114
Stanford University $628,835,527
Yale University $622,499,969
University of California, Los Angeles $580,267,623
University of California, San Diego $572,451,525
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill $559,512,811
University of Washington, Seattle $558,170,733
Vanderbilt University $546,405,280
Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine $501,120,829
Emory University $485,429,870
University of Wisconsin, Madison $446,888,313
New York University $424,963,095
Northwestern University $413,561,989
---
Source: Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2024/02/10/top-20-universities-for-nih-funding-johns-hopkins-ranks-first-again/.
---
Note: The table above shows only grants from NIH. In UCLA's case, the total contracts and grants revenue was $1.3 billion, much of which comes from the federal government of which NIH is a part. UCLA's total budget was $11.7 billion. Note also that money flows into UCLA from other federal programs such as Medicare, Medi-Cal (Medicaid), student loans, etc.
Source: UCLA Annual Report 2023 at https://ucla.app.box.com/v/acct-pdf-AFR-22-23.
---
From the NY Times: ...The opening weeks of President Trump’s second term have cast America’s campuses into turmoil, with upheaval that threatens to erode the financial foundation of higher education in the United States. As the administration orders the end of diversity programs and imposes cuts to foreign aid, university presidents and their lawyers fear that millions of dollars in federal funding could ultimately vanish. Some research projects, including many connected to the U.S. Agency for International Development, have been suspended, and program directors have made plans for layoffs.
But universities have largely been quiet. Professors and administrators alike seem wary of provoking a president who has glorified retribution and has already started to tighten the funding spigot. Staying out of the spotlight, some reason, is prudent. Those who have spoken have often relied on carefully calibrated letters and statements, noting that they are watching but hardly offering any overt opposition. In some instances, researchers and campus leaders have been pressured into silence by a government that has demanded they not speak to reporters as money remains bottled up...
Full story at https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/04/us/trump-executive-orders-universities.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment