Pages

Sunday, August 9, 2026

Will Harvard Continue to Lead the Charge? - Part 187

From the Harvard Crimson: Harvard withheld annual raises and performance bonuses from unionized academic workers across the University this summer, prompting Harvard Law School clinical instructors to file an unfair labor practice charge late last month alleging the move violated federal labor law. Union representatives said they knew of no Harvard Academic Workers-United Auto Workers members in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard Medical School, or Harvard Divinity School who received the raises awarded to non-union employees.

At the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, employees represented by HAW-UAW were informed by the institute’s human resources department that they would not receive the annual performance bonus or the July 1 salary increase, according to an email obtained by The Crimson... To prevent unilateral decisions that could undermine the bargaining process, employers are required under the NLRA to maintain status quo terms of employment while a contract is under negotiation. But the central dispute between the union and Harvard is whether Harvard’s history of awarding annual raises established a status quo the University was required to continue.

“You have to look at all the facts,” said Risa L. Lieberwitz, a professor of labor and employment law at Cornell University. “Is there a pattern that was established, and if it was interrupted, did that change the nature of the status quo?” Harvard has argued that maintaining the status quo means keeping wages constant until compensation is settled in bargaining...

Full story at https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2026/8/6/haw-withheld-raises-bonuses/.

Left Unsaid - Part 2 (told you so)


Diligent blog readers may recall our comments on a systemwide Academic Senate request for campus senates to respond to UC changes in supply chain management.* We noted at the time that the topic was not an attention grabber because there was no clear summary of what was being proposed that was new and why those changes might matter. We noted that grant holders in fields where purchasing was important would potentially be interested, IF they had such a summary.

As expected, the reactions from the campuses were predictably limited and muted, absent a clear summary. The cover letter from the Senate chair notes:

The review materials also made it difficult for reviewers to identify the complete set of revisions.**

A stronger letter might have said that if meaningful comments were wanted, a meaningful highlighting of key changes would be necessary, and that absent such a summary, the review cannot proceed.

===

*https://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/2026/06/left-unsaid.html.

**https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/reports/council-chair-to-systemwide-procurement-bus-43-7-24-26.pdf.

Straws in the Wind - Part 428 (Failsafe)

From Inside Higher Ed: Starting in fall 2027, the University of Michigan’s College of Literature, Science, and the Arts will grade all first-year students as pass/no credit for their first semester. Students will still receive grades and instructor feedback on their coursework, but the grades will not count toward their GPAs or appear on their external transcripts, which will state that all LSA first-semester grades are automatically designated P/NC. The pilot program is designed to help create “an environment where college students can acclimate to the demands of a University of Michigan education and pursue new academic challenges,” according to the LSA webpage announcing the change. “We believe that covering grades will help students start strong and curb the mental health crisis unfolding among college-aged individuals.”

Officials also said they hope eliminating grades will foster connection rather than competition among students, and encourage them to “explore a subject that may not come easily to them or take a course in a new field without the fear that a low grade may have long-term consequences.” ...

Full story at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2026/08/05/umich-college-shifts-pnc-grading-first-year-students.

These things don't always work out as planned:


The film follows a crisis caused by a critical error that sends a group of U.S. bombers to destroy Moscow, and the ensuing attempts to stop the bomber group before it can deploy a nuclear first strike...

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fail_Safe_(1964_film)

Saturday, August 8, 2026

Trouble on the 405 this weekend

From Patch: Traffic will be impacted on the 405 Freeway and nearby roads beginning Friday when construction will shut down several lanes and ramps of the interstate in the San Fernando Valley for the entire weekend.

Here's a look at the closures, planned for 10 p.m. Friday, Aug. 7 through 5 a.m. Monday, Aug. 10:

Southbound 405

  • Southbound 405 will be reduced to three lanes between Ventura Boulevard and Mulholland Drive
  • The Ventura Boulevard on-ramp to the southbound 405 will be closed
  • The Valley Vista Boulevard/Sepulveda Boulevard on-ramp to the southbound 405 will be closed

--

Northbound 405

  • The northbound 405 off-ramp to Getty Center Drive will be closed

==

Full story at https://patch.com/california/santamonica/s/klsr9/405-freeway-closures-to-snarl-traffic-in-la-county-beginning-friday.

Want to subscribe to this blog?


You can't subscribe directly. But you can subscribe indirectly to this blog via a service called Blogtrottr. Go to blogtrottr.com and you will get a screen like the one shown above. Fill in the URL for the blog:

https://danmitchellsblogcontinues.blogspot.com/ 

or

https://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/

and put in your email address. 

You will then receive an email at the email address you provided asking you to confirm. After you confirm, you will receive an email notification of new postings whenever they appear. If there are, say, three postings on a particular day, you will receive three notifications (one for each one). 

Note and full disclosure: There are ads on these notifications.

Best

Yours truly is always skeptical about rankings such as those below. But you will undoubtedly be told about it by the three UC systems listed. So you might as well read about it here:

BEST HOSPITALS HONOR ROLL 2026-2027: From US News and World Report

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Cleveland Clinic

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Houston Methodist Hospital

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Massachusetts General Hospital

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic-Arizona

Mayo Clinic-Florida

Mount Sinai Hospital

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia and Cornell

Northwestern Medicine-Northwestern Memorial Hospital

NYU Langone Hospitals

Rush University Medical Center

Stanford Health Care-Stanford Hospital

UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center

UC San Diego Health-La Jolla, Hillcrest, and East Campus Medical Centers

UCSF Health-UCSF Medical Center

University of Michigan Health-Ann Arbor

--

Source: https://health.usnews.com/best-hospitals/rankings.

 

More or Less - Part 2 (Trendiness)

From the Daily Californian: Twenty-three UC and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory projects were among those announced under the Department of Energy’s Genesis Mission, a national initiative towards “AI-driven scientific discovery.” The DOE is committing more than $5 billion to the mission, which spans national laboratories, academia and industry. 

Genesis Mission-funded projects will “enable researchers to … refine new approaches to accelerating scientific discovery and breakthroughs,” according to Berkeley Lab spokesperson Jonathan Carter. Berkeley Lab contributions to the Genesis Mission will integrate AI with research into grid infrastructure, nuclear energy and more. However, for some researchers, this funding comes at an odd time given cuts to other grants. In May, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to allow generic grant terminations by the EPA, NEH and NSF in the ongoing Thakur v. Trump lawsuit filed on behalf of UC researchers. Five days before the funding announcement, a district court ruled against President Donald Trump’s administration for canceling active research grants in a separate lawsuit...

Full story at https://www.dailycal.org/news/campus/research-and-ideas/uc-berkeley-affiliated-ai-research-receives-funding-from-doe-despite-other-trump-funding-cuts/article_e729ccaa-62e5-411e-a099-45e2efff7896.html.

===

From the Daily Bruin: Facing a federal funding denial, a UCLA research group is turning to OnlyFans to raise money and bring awareness to long-term research funding difficulties. The Blumstein Lab, which studies marmot behavior, started videos of the large rodents on OnlyFans – a subscription-based adult entertainment content creation platform – under the name “OnlyMarms” after the National Science Foundation rejected the researchers’ proposals to renew their grant. The researchers have received thousands of dollars in donations and subscription money since launching the account... Securing grants under the Trump administration has become increasingly difficult. The federal government has proposed sweeping changes to the United States Office of Management and Budget’s framework for managing federal grants and suspended millions in universities’ research grants...

The lab has raised more than $6,000 from OnlyMarms as of [July 29], of which OnlyFans takes 20%, according to a Rocky Mountain Biological Lab Marmot Project Instagram post...

Full story at https://dailybruin.com/2026/08/01/ucla-marmot-research-lab-turns-to-onlyfans-after-funding-cuts

Straws in the Wind - Part 427 (Is Penn Mightier?)


From the Daily Pennsylvanian: As Penn President Larry Jameson prepares to step down next year, he leaves behind a reputation as a stabilizing force during a turbulent era for higher education. Jameson announced his intention to leave his position as president by June 2027 in a campus-wide message last month. Since being named interim president in December 2023, he has steered the University toward institutional neutrality and launched campus-wide initiatives while confronting the lasting effects of student protests and federal turmoil. His term as permanent Penn president, which began in March 2025, will be the second shortest — longer only than that of his predecessor, Liz Magill. The University Board of Trustees has begun the search for Penn’s next leader and is currently inviting community feedback through a survey.

...Jameson was appointed interim president in December 2023 after Magill resigned amid backlash for her remarks regarding Penn’s response to antisemitism. The following months were marked by pro-Palestinian protests, culminating in the Gaza Solidarity Encampment on College Green which was dismantled by police in May 2024. Weeks later, Penn instituted temporary standards for campus demonstrations — which tightened requirements for event planning and banned encampments — and initiated a review of the Guidelines on Open Expression. Nearly a year into his interim term, Jameson announced new guidelines surrounding Penn’s “response to external events.” At the time, Jameson wrote that Penn would “refrain from institutional statements made in response to local and world events except for those which have direct and significant bearing on University functions” in an email to the University community.

...In April 2025, as Penn and other universities were impacted by sweeping federal changes to higher education, Jameson cited institutional neutrality as the reason for Penn’s quieter stance... Jameson is expected to review the final draft recommendations and publish the new open expression guidelines. The deadline for a finalized version was extended further into the fall following campus pushback...

In March 2025, the Trump administration froze $175 million in federal funding to Penn, criticizing the University’s failure to remove transgender athletes from women’s sports. Penn entered a resolution agreement with the administration in July — becoming the first Ivy League to settle with the White House and restoring the University’s funding...

Full story at https://www.thedp.com/article/2026/08/penn-president-larry-jameson-institutional-neutrality-civil-rights-federal-government-trump.

Parallel Blogs

We have been putting out this blog since 2009 under the heading "UCLA Faculty Association" using the link:

https://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/

The blog site was originally created by the then-executive director of the Faculty Association. As such, yours truly does not have control of the site; he is simply a blogger on it. So when technical issues arise, that can be a problem. Given that issue, we have been experimenting with a parallel site with the same blog entries since July 23rd:

https://danmitchellsblogcontinues.blogspot.com/

We will be running the two in parallel for the indefinite future. Possibly, at some point we will switch to the new link.

If you read the blog using the Facebook page of Yousee Elayemeriti, you can continue to do so.

Friday, August 7, 2026

Yours truly will tell you how students get in for less



=== 

One way students get into Berkeley: They walk in through Sather Gate.



===

One way students get into UCLA: They walk in through the Westwood and Le Conte entrance.

===

So there you have the answers, courtesy of yours truly. And they didn't cost you a (now-discontinued) penny.

7.25 > 6.75


July 30, 2026

Nathan Brostrom

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, UC Finance

Re: Recommendation to Increase the Actuarial Rate of Return for UCRP

Dear CFO Brostrom:

At the July 22, 2026 meeting, the Academic Council unanimously endorsed the recommendation of the University Committee on Faculty Welfare (UCFW) and its Task Force on Investments and Retirement (TFIR) to increase the assumed actuarial rate of return for the University of California Retirement Plan (UCRP) from 6.75% to 7.25%.

Council first reviewed the proposal at our June 2026 meeting, when TFIR presented its analysis of UCRP’s long-term investment performance, funding position, and cash flows. TFIR concluded that the current assumption is unnecessarily conservative and increasing it to 7.25% would better reflect expected long-term returns, reduce unnecessary contribution requirements, and preserve resources for the University’s core mission without reducing pension benefits.

Before taking action, Council asked the University Committee on Planning and Budget (UCPB) to review the proposal. UCPB subsequently endorsed the proposed increase, while emphasizing the importance of adhering to Regents Policy 5601. Council agreed that UC should follow the policy’s established mechanisms for adjusting contributions when investment performance differs from actuarial assumptions and that future funding shortfalls should not be addressed by shifting additional costs to University employees.

Council recognizes that the actuarial rate is a long-term planning assumption rather than a guarantee of future investment performance.

Nevertheless, Council concluded that the evidence presented by TFIR supports the proposed 7.25% rate and that maintaining an unnecessarily conservative assumption carries substantial opportunity costs for UC.

I am forwarding the attached UCFW-TFIR proposal and UCPB endorsement for your consideration as the University reviews the actuarial assumptions governing UCRP Sincerely,

Ahmet Palazoglu

Chair, Academic Council

cc: Academic Council, Chief Investment Officer Bachher, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Nava, Vice President Henderson, UCFW Chair Bales, TFIR Chair Hollenbach, UCPB Chair Brosnan, Senate Division Executive Directors, Senate Executive Director Lin

===

Comment:

The important thing to note is that changing assumptions about the future does not change the future. The actual rate of return that will occur in the future depends on the investment strategy (the mix of assets held by the plan) and future financial market conditions. From the TFIR report:

"Changing the assumed rate of return does not change the actual return on investments; actual returns to the UCRP investment portfolio follow from the asset allocation policy set by The Regents and the returns those assets produce."

Note that the same can be said about liabilities of the plan which depend on policies regarding eligibility that may be enacted by future Regents, changes in life expectancy, changes in hiring and retirement behavior at UC, etc. Making assumptions about such matters in the future does not, by itself, change the actual future course of events.

Basically, being more conservative about assumptions requires more funding to achieve a planned 100% pension funding ratio. Being less conservative requires less funding, but increases the risk of underfunding. Although it is not explicitly stated in the report, in a period in which the funding model for UC is under strain, the attraction of being less conservative - even if it entails more risk - increases.

Straws in the Wind - Part 426 (How Now Brown President?)


August 3, 2026

Leadership transition: Preparing for Brown’s next chapter

Dear Members of the Brown Community,

My first year as Brown University’s 19th president began on July 1, 2012. I was excited to be joining a university with such a distinguished and distinctive history. I remember, at the time, feeling a profound sense of optimism and gratitude, coupled with the humility that comes with the enormous responsibility of leading a great university.

More than 14 years later, the experience has been all that I could have hoped for, and more. I fell in love with Brown and all that Brown stands for: its embrace of excellence in education and research in the service of society; the priority it places on intellectual curiosity and independence; and its strong sense of community that binds students, faculty, staff and alumni together.

And so, it was with mixed emotions that I informed the Corporation of Brown University earlier today that the 2026-27 academic year will be my last as Brown’s president. This is the right decision for me and my family. And I firmly believe that it is the best path for Brown. Fifteen years is a significant tenure for any president, and in that time, this amazing community of faculty, staff, students, alumni, parents and friends showed up in so many ways to achieve the bold aspirations in the strategic plan we developed together near the beginning of my presidency. We worked vigilantly to demonstrate the value of Brown to the world, and we all can be proud of and deeply grateful for the transformative impact of a community-driven fundraising campaign that made so much of our work possible.

Brown is wonderfully poised to begin its next chapter, and a transition in leadership now will ensure the vision for the next phase is set by Brown’s next leader and stewarded by them from the beginning. I am committed to ongoing work to contribute to Brown’s strength and resilience until I step down at the end of the academic year.

In May of 2025, I agreed to extend my service as president past the previous June 2026 end date of my term so that I could help Brown navigate a federal funding freeze that imperiled our mission of research and education. I am proud that we came to an agreement with the federal government that restored our funding while staying true to Brown’s values.

While the federal landscape remains volatile for all colleges and universities, Brown is receiving major grants for pioneering research that will lead to tremendous innovation for this country. Our faculty, staff and students are doing both basic and applied research that holds the promise of advancing medical treatment, improving human wellbeing through technological progress, helping us understand the human condition and society, and influencing policy that addresses critical issues facing nations and communities. We also continue to expand access to a Brown education and to admit the best and brightest students in alignment with our commitment to bring students with a diversity of ideas, perspectives and experiences to Brown to educate them for lives of meaning and purpose.

I will look back on my time as Brown’s president as the most rewarding job I could possibly have had. Truly, it has been the opportunity of a lifetime. I have had the distinct privilege of collaborating with extraordinary colleagues — members of my senior team, faculty, staff, alumni and parents — and, above all, the joy of working alongside Brown’s remarkable students. The trustees and fellows of the Corporation of Brown University have been an endless source of wise advice and support.

Together, we have moved this University forward, expanding access to education and supporting education, research and scholarship that make the world better. We have celebrated our many shared successes and supported one another through times of challenge and profound loss. Through it all, our collective focus has been on doing what is best to advance Brown as both a world-class research university and a vibrant, caring and inclusive community.

I look forward to Brown’s future. Universities thrive on the excitement of new ideas and the healthy challenge of reinvention that only a new president can bring. As we navigate a transformative era for higher education in America, Brown’s model — open, collaborative, curiosity-driven and student-centered — is more essential than ever. It is the right time for a new Brown president who will have the distinct privilege and pleasure of leading a university that is exceptionally well positioned for impact in the years ahead.

My husband, Ari Gabinet, and I are deeply grateful for the warm embrace we have received from the Brown, Providence, and Rhode Island communities. After more than 14 years, this is home, and we plan to contribute to Brown’s continued success and support our local community in the years to come.

Chancellor Brian Moynihan will provide further information regarding the search process, which will engage members of the Brown community. While the search for the next president gets underway, we still have much to accomplish together in the year ahead. In a few weeks, as always, I will send a letter to the community that lays out goals for the coming year. This is not a time to put ambitious plans on pause. I look forward to working with all of you as we continue to move Brown forward.

In the meantime, I wish you a restful and productive conclusion to your summer. 

Ever true, with love and gratitude,

Christina H. Paxson

President

---

Source: https://president.brown.edu/president/2026-08-03-paxson.

Thursday, August 6, 2026

ET Phone Home Because Can't Read


UCLA Study: Kids who own cellphones have poorer reading comprehension scores than those who don’t, researchers find

Holly Ober, July 27, 2026  UCLA News Release

---

Key takeaways 

  • The widespread concern about the effect of cellphones on reading comprehension in elementary school children has led to surprisingly little experimental research. 
  • New research by UCLA psychologists found a statistically significant relationship between owning a cellphone and lower reading scores — children who owned cellphones had poorer reading comprehension than those who did not. 
  • In fact, simply owning a phone correlated with worse reading comprehension, whether or not the phone was brought to school. 

===

School cellphone bans might seem like a good way to improve learning for elementary school children, but new research published in Behavioral Sciences shows that simply owning a cellphone correlates with worse reading comprehension. Whether a child brings the phone to school or not made no difference on the same metric, the team of UCLA psychologists and researchers found. 

“We found that there’s no age at which you can give a child a phone that’s better or worse for reading comprehension, so it’s just having a phone at all,” said lead author and UCLA psychology professor Patricia Greenfield. “That’s true in third grade, and it’s true in sixth grade.” 

The study came about as researchers sought to answer the question: Do cellphones interfere with the concentration required to perform well on academic tests? They focused on determining whether the acquisition of a phone was negatively related to reading comprehension performance on tests for third and sixth graders. 

The widespread concern about the effect of cellphones on reading in elementary school children has led to surprisingly little experimental research. The authors note only two previous studies in elementary school children. One showed that texting benefits the skill of grasping meaning; the other showed texting to be a negative influence on basic reading mechanics at the letter and word level. 

To conduct the new study, researchers obtained approval to test children’s reading comprehension with and without phones on a group of culturally and linguistically diverse children in Antelope Valley public schools and Coptic Church schools in Los Angeles. County. Phones were normally allowed in both types of settings.

The children — some who owned a phone and others who did not — read short passages. Some children had a phone with them at school, while others did not. Researchers then tested them on what they understood about each passage. Students also filled out a survey about their cellphone ownership and use.

The researchers found a statistically significant relationship between owning a personal cellphone and lower reading scores — children who owned cellphones had poorer comprehension than those who did not. This negative relationship between phone ownership and reading scores held for students who spoke English at home and those who did not. Testing for distraction from phone notifications was not possible because the students received almost no notifications during the experiments. Furthermore, there was no difference in reading comprehension when phones were on desks or out of sight. The reported age at which a child acquired their first phone did not correlate with reading comprehension skill. 

“The children who brought their phones to school had the same reading scores as children who did not have phones at school that day. So, it’s ownership of a phone, not the immediate presence of one, that correlates with poorer reading comprehension at the elementary school level,” said Greenfield. 

The study found some good news for students who do not speak English at home. For students from non-English-speaking homes who had their own phone, reading comprehension was significantly better the earlier they started using their phone to text.

“If you have a phone and if you’re from a family where English is not spoken at home, it’s better for reading comprehension to start texting earlier rather than later,” said Greenfield. “In fact, when students from Arabic- or Spanish-speaking homes began to text in second or third grade, by sixth grade they had reading comprehension scores similar to their peers who still did not have phones.” 

Although results suggest no academic effect of school bans through sixth grade, cell phone bans in the elementary grades should improve children’s social skills and relationships by increasing in-person interaction with peers and teachers; this is an important area for future research.

Postgraduate research assistant Marola Hanna, doctoral student Rocio Burgos-Calvillo, and assistant research professor Laura Rhinehart, all of whom are at UCLA, are co-authors of the paper. 

A grant from the Flora Family Foundation supported the study.

---

Source: https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/owning-a-cell-phone-associated-with-poorer-reading-comprehension-schoolchildren.

New Housing and Hospitality AVC

From the Daily Bruin: UCLA appointed a new associate vice chancellor for housing and hospitality, Administrative Vice Chancellor Michael Beck announced Monday. Sarah Dundish, the director of administration and chief of staff for UCLA Housing and Hospitality, assume[d] the position Wednesday...

The department manages UCLA’s student housing, dining services, university apartments, hotels and conference facilities. Housing and Hospitality employs more than 2,600 people and serves more than 25,000 students, faculty, staff and guests... Dundish – a UCLA alumnus – will take on the role ahead of the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games. UCLA’s residential and dining facilities will serve as the Olympic Village for the games. About 78% of campus housing will be used to house athletes from mid-June to mid-September 2028... 

Full story at https://dailybruin.com/2026/08/03/ucla-appoints-new-housing-hospitality-associate-vice-chancellor.

Note that Housing and Hospitality now has responsibility for operations of the University Club (former Faculty Club).

Straws in the Wind - Part 425 (Open Letter)

From the NY Times: The Trump administration is making another push to persuade university leaders to address policies that it says have eroded trust with the American public, sending an open letter on Monday to college leaders asking them to respond to concerns over academic standards, admissions procedures and tuition costs. The letter, signed by Education Secretary Linda McMahon, is a significant departure from an attempt last year to incentivize universities with a so-called compact that dangled easier access to research funding for schools that embraced the administration’s agenda. That proposal was widely rejected.

...University presidents and governing boards are [now being] asked to address seven subjects — including free speech, foreign influence, artificial intelligence and academic rigor — and post the statements prominently on their websites. Ms. McMahon’s letter, which does not include any funding threats, suggests that changes will improve academia’s reputation among American parents and students. “The dilution of academic standards, opaque admissions policies and a domineering monoculture have badly eroded public trust,” she wrote, adding that “only full candor and transparency can begin to strengthen the bonds between higher education and the American people.”

It was not immediately clear how the nation’s thousands of colleges and universities would respond to Ms. McMahon’s letter. But Ted Mitchell, the president of the American Council on Education, which was not involved in talks with the government before the letter’s release, said he regarded the missive as “a tentative handshake” between the administration and academic institutions. He predicted a significant response. “For many institutions, this is kind of a no-brainer — it’s a fill-in-the-blanks kind of thing if they want to do it,” said Dr. Mitchell, who noted that many of the topics Ms. McMahon asked schools to discuss had already been subjects of immense debate among education leaders...

Full story at https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/03/us/trump-mcmahon-colleges-letter.html.

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

A court decision opened the door, but...

The issue of UC hiring (or not hiring) undocumented students keeps coming up in public comments at Regents meetings. The next open Regents meetings are in mid-September. Whether the issue will be on the agenda is unknown.

From the Daily Bruin: The California Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal in the case Umaña Muñoz v. Regents of the University of California in October 2025, letting stand the court of appeals’ ruling that the University cannot bar undocumented students from holding on-campus jobs and that the UC’s current hiring policies discriminate based on immigration status. However, more than eight months later, immigrant rights advocates said the UC has not taken action to comply with the ruling...

A UC Office of the President spokesperson said in an emailed statement that... the court’s decision doesn’t change current hiring practices or mandate the UC to hire undocumented students, the spokesperson added. ...UC... previously argued during the court case that its hiring policies aim to comply with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, a federal law that makes it illegal for employers to hire undocumented people. A majority of regents said not complying would risk billions of dollars in federal research grants...

Full story at https://dailybruin.com/2026/08/02/undocumented-students-push-for-uc-job-opportunities-citing-california-court-ruling.

Note: The case can be found at:

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-court-of-appeal/117570869.html.

More or Less?

From the Daily Californian: Twenty-three UC and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory projects were among those announced under the Department of Energy’s Genesis Mission, a national initiative towards “AI-driven scientific discovery.” The DOE is committing more than $5 billion to the mission, which spans national laboratories, academia and industry. Genesis Mission-funded projects will “enable researchers to … refine new approaches to accelerating scientific discovery and breakthroughs,” according to Berkeley Lab spokesperson Jonathan Carter. Berkeley Lab contributions to the Genesis Mission will integrate AI with research into grid infrastructure, nuclear energy and more. 

However, for some researchers, this funding comes at an odd time given cuts to other grants. In May, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to allow generic grant terminations by the EPA, NEH and NSF in the ongoing Thakur v. Trump lawsuit filed on behalf of UC researchers. Five days before the funding announcement, a district court ruled against President Donald Trump’s administration for canceling active research grants in a separate lawsuit... 

The DOE’s emphasis on AI funding comes as part of the broader administration’s “AI action plan,” which cites a global race for AI development, and a mission to reap economic and military benefits. Last week, science and technology advisor Michael Kratsios released a report proposing a reduction in total university research funding alongside the push for increased AI funding. Of the 278 projects awarded funding in the Genesis Mission, 151 are led by universities and 87 by national laboratories...

Full story at https://www.dailycal.org/news/campus/research-and-ideas/uc-berkeley-affiliated-ai-research-receives-funding-from-doe-despite-other-trump-funding-cuts/article_e729ccaa-62e5-411e-a099-45e2efff7896.html.

Straws in the Wind - Part 424

From the California Post: The Cornell University student who declared he’s “not interested in working for a Jew” got tossed from his parents’ $1.75 million home in Virginia — and is now sniveling online for cash. Austin Franco, who went viral for declining a job interview at NYC startup VryfID for antisemitic reasons, took to X on Wednesday, declaring, “My parents are kicking me out.” But the hater did get some good news the next day, as Cornell revealed to The Post that, unlike his disappointed parents, Alexander and Diana, the liberal upstate college won’t kick him to the curb.

The rising junior created a GiveSendGo campaign, which has already amassed more than $8,000 from twisted supporters — on top of the roughly $25,000 raised in a separate fundraiser. “I will be kicked out of my home on August 1st. Any support you can provide would be greatly appreciated, as would any advice,” the 19-year-old whined... “I do not regret anything I have done. If I were to die today, I would at least know that I did so believing in myself. Thank you, and may God be with you.” ...

Full story at https://nypost.com/2026/08/01/us-news/antisemitic-cornell-student-austin-franco-begs-for-cash-after-parent-boot/.


 

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Moneyball

From UCLA Athletics: UCLA Athletics announced today that it received more than $41 million in private philanthropic support from more than 6,500 donors during fiscal year 2025-26. The year’s momentum represents an 80.6% increase in fundraising over the past two years. "The Bruin family has once again demonstrated its unwavering commitment to our student-athletes by helping us provide an elite experience both on and off the field,” UCLA’s Alice and Nahum Lainer Family Director of Athletics Martin Jarmond said... 

The year was highlighted by several transformational gifts, including a $10 million commitment from Angelo M. Mazzone III to establish the naming endowment for the UCLA Head Football Coach position. UCLA Athletics also received multiple seven-figure gifts, reflecting significant donor confidence in the future of UCLA Athletics...

Full release at https://uclabruins.com/news/2026/07/27/ucla-athletics-celebrates-strong-year-of-philanthropic-support.

Straws in the Wind - Part 423

From the Chronicle of Higher Education: In its latest push to overhaul federal research funding, the White House... stated its intention to divert research grants away from universities and toward “individual researchers.” The 123-page report, “Science: A New Golden Age,” crystallizes the Trump administration’s vision for the American scientific enterprise, breaking away from the decades-old university research system in favor of private companies, independent projects, and artificial intelligence-driven research...*

Researchers who spoke to The Chronicle, however, are more than skeptical that the shift would accelerate scientific discovery. They’re also unconvinced that the White House’s vision for science aligns with the realities and needs of American researchers... Many of the administrative burdens alluded to in the report, researchers said, are imposed by the federal government itself, not universities. Researchers have long complained of growing bureaucratic burdens tied to federal grant regulations, with 66 percent of new federal research regulations having been introduced within the past decade. Universities can lessen that burden by providing administrative staff to help cut through red tape, while private ventures and “individual” researchers might have less capacity to properly document that they’re following regulations... 

“The reason why scientists are concentrated at institutions is because the labs that they use are expensive,” [Melinda] Rostal, [an epidemiologist and a member of the organization Defend Public Health,] said. “All that infrastructure is needed by the researchers.” ...

Full story at https://www.chronicle.com/article/why-scientists-hate-trumps-new-plan-to-revamp-research-funding.

===

Report at https://www.whitehouse.gov/science/.

On or Off?

From the Sacramento Bee: A sudden $12 million federal funding cut last year forced a UC Davis transportation research center and its partners to halt dozens of projects, disrupt student research and scramble for replacement money — setting off a legal fight that has left the center’s future uncertain more than a year later. The National Center for Sustainable Transportation quickly suspended research already underway and delayed projects scheduled to begin.

“Except for the Great Recession we haven’t had anything like this,” said Fraser Shilling, whose project modeling how traffic light and sound affects nearby wildlife was halted. “It was kind of like an administration-imposed recession on academia.”

The center was one of multiple university programs affected when the Trump administration canceled $54 million in previously awarded grants for programs that used “woke” terms in their applications, according to a U.S. Department of Transportation news release. The cut began a more than yearlong scramble to rearrange projects, seek private donations and fight for the funding in federal court as part of Thakur v. Trump, said center director Susan Handy. Although a judge ordered the funding restored late last year, the center’s work and employees have remained in flux as the lawsuit continues and the possibility remains that the money could disappear again...

Full story at https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article316689358.html.

Possible Trump Jam on the 405 Today

There could be problems on the 405 south of UCLA today due to a presidential motorcade.

From Patch: President Donald Trump is scheduled to make a rare visit to Los Angeles County on Tuesday, speaking at a Republican National Committee dinner at the Trump National Golf Club in Rancho Palos Verdes...

Although no official arrival plans have been announced, presidential visits to Southern California often involve Air Force One landing at Los Angeles International Airport before the president continues by helicopter or motorcade. Officials have not said whether that will be the case Tuesday. No traffic advisories had been issued Monday by the California Highway Patrol, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department or other local agencies as they don't announce the president's route in advance for security purposes. Residents planning to travel Tuesday, particularly near Los Angeles International Airport, the Harbor area or the Palos Verdes Peninsula, may want to allow extra time and check traffic conditions before heading out. Previous presidential visits to the Los Angeles area have resulted in temporary freeway closures, rolling traffic holds and road closures along motorcade routes, sometimes with little advance notice...

Full story at https://patch.com/california/palosverdes/trump-make-rare-trip-la-county-give-rnc-speech-his-golf-course.

Note: This could have been a special problem for UCLA if someone had found a use for its $80 million Palos Verdes campus acquisition. But so far nobody has.

Monday, August 3, 2026

If it's from the Big Ten, UCLA went along

Note: Nothing in the description below suggests that college athletes had any say in this deal.

From Yahoo Sports: The Big Ten and SEC have struck a deal with federal lawmakers over legislation to regulate the college sports industry. Each of the league's presidents and chancellors voted Friday evening to swing their support behind the Protect College Sports Act in a stunning and about-face development that thrusts the legislation forward. The two conferences announced the deal via a joint statement [last] Friday night.

The SEC and Big Ten's support is central to the bill's passage... And there was urgency to hold a vote vote [this] week before lawmakers leave for a monthlong recess... While the bill would still need to pass the House of Representatives, Senate ratification would stand as one of the most historic moves in college sports history and a victorious moment for the NCAA's seven-year lobbying effort for a congressional bill.

The key components of the bill would grant the NCAA and conferences a limited antitrust exemption to re-implement the one-time transfer exception, standardize a five-year eligibility policy, ban professional athletes from returning to college, establish an agent registry and maximum fee (5%) and, as noted above, create a more strict athlete revenue-share cap.

The revenue-share cap, for weeks now, has been at the center of the negotiations between conference officials and co-authors of the bill itself, Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and Schmitt, and their staffs. Opposed to collective bargaining and employment, college sports leaders are working to establish a harder cap like the NFL as opposed to the current state of affairs, where schools are exceeding the $21.3 million cap, in some cases, by triple that figure, by redirecting sponsorship and apparel cash from the athletic department to their roster. According to the bill, all athlete deals with university-contracted businesses (associated entities), such as multimedia rights partners, corporate sponsors and apparel brands, would be included in a school's revenue-share payments and count against the cap...

Full story at https://sports.yahoo.com/college-football/article/sec-big-ten-vote-to-support-congressional-college-sports-bill-after-mad-scramble-001809916.html.

===

Joint statement above at https://x.com/SEC/status/2083371653153566937.

Suggestions

The systemwide Academic Council reviewed a policy guide for UCPD known as the "Gold Book" and proposed changes.* As part of the process, comments were solicited from campus Senates and two systemwide committees. As might be expected, a summarizing of the resulting comments ends up as a shopping list of concerns - a kind of data dump of 144(!) pages - along with a statement that some people had "no objection" to what was proposed. However, the Council did make some specific recommendations. Below, yours truly has distilled the recommendations that are explicitly attributed to the Council. 

The full letter from the Council chair with attached documents can be found at:

https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/reports/council-chair-to-systemwide-community-safety-goldbook.pdf.

As requested, I distributed for systemwide Academic Senate review the proposed revisions to Systemwide Policies Applying to the University of California Police Department, commonly known as the “Gold Book.” Nine Senate divisions and two systemwide Senate committees (UCODE and UCFW) submitted comments. These were discussed at the Academic Council’s July 22, 2026 meeting, and the compiled feedback is attached for your reference. The responses reflected a range of views. Some reviewers expressed no objection or found the revisions generally appropriate, while others recommended substantial revisions before the policies are finalized. After considering the comments, the Academic Council identified several overarching concerns and recommendations, summarized below.

Review Materials and Consultation Process

Many reviewers found the materials difficult to evaluate because it was not always clear which policies were new, which had been substantially revised, and which included only technical or legally required updates. The Academic Council recommends that future reviews include an executive summary identifying new policies, major substantive revisions, and technical or legally required changes, along with an explanation of the reasons for significant revisions...

Distinctive Nature of Policing in a University Environment

The Council believes that policies governing UCPD should be tailored to the mission and setting of a public university rather than relying primarily on language designed for municipal law enforcement agencies. The Council recommends that the Gold Book affirm UCPD’s role in helping the University respect and protect academic freedom, civil liberties, and expressive activity and place greater emphasis on community engagement and relationship-building...

De-escalation and Use of Force

...The Council recommends making de-escalation and the least intrusive reasonable means the default whenever circumstances permit, with force used only when necessary...

Expressive Activity and Academic Freedom

...The Council recommends clearer standards for distinguishing protected conduct and peaceful noncompliance from behavior that presents an imminent safety threat...

Governance, Oversight, and Transparency

The Council recommends stronger independent and community-based oversight of UCPD, with meaningful participation by UC faculty, students, staff, and other campus constituents...

Surveillance, Privacy, and Information Collection

(Various concerns are attributed to "several reviewers," but it is unclear from the text whether the Council had specific recommendations.)

Equity, Disability, and Mental Health Response

The Council recommends greater attention to implicit and explicit bias, discrimination, cultural awareness, disability, neurodiversity, and mental health crises...

===

*A 2010 edition of the Gold Book can be found at:

https://policy.ucop.edu/doc/4000382/PoliceProceduresManual. The Council apparently saw a later version with proposed changes. It is unclear exactly what the Council was given.

Straws in the Wind - Part 422

From Inside Higher Ed: English professor Vinita Prabhakar is suing South Florida State College after she was abruptly fired for teaching a story the college president deemed “political,” according to a complaint filed Wednesday in Florida district court. Prabhakar assigned her freshman English students “Bettering Myself,” an award-winning story by Ottessa Moshfegh that centers on a Catholic school math teacher who drinks to excess and talks about sex with her students. One of her students told Prabhakar the story made them “a bit uncomfortable” ...

Following several days of back-and-forth with other administrators about the assignment, Prabhakar met with South Florida State President Fred Hawkins on Feb. 11. During the meeting, Hawkins said “he would not want his own college-aged daughter reading” the story, and that he didn’t “ever want to see this story again,” the complaint states. He also told Prabhakar he’d been in contact “with Tallahassee” and the Board of Trustees about the matter... A day later, college officials removed Prabhakar from the classroom and told her that her contract would not be renewed... Prabhakar joins a growing list of professors who have sued their institutions after being fired, alleging First Amendment violations...

Full story at https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2026/07/31/professor-fired-teaching-political-story-sues-college

Lawsuit at https://www.fire.org/research-learn/complaint-prabhakar-v-hawkins-et-al.

Moving Apart


From SFGATE: A record number of California students were offered admission to the University of California this fall, but the gains weren’t spread evenly across the system, with some campuses defying the trend, new preliminary data shows. The overall fall 2026 California student admission rate for the UC’s nine undergraduate campuses was 78%, compared with 77% the previous year. The system accepted a total of 153,272 first-year students, both in-state and out-of-state students, the UC said. 

One of the most competitive campuses, UC Berkeley, however, didn’t follow the system’s upward trend, admitting approximately 4% fewer first-year California students than the year before. The Bay Area campus offered admission to 9,445 such students for the fall, compared with 9,852 in 2025, according to UC data... Meanwhile, UC Berkeley’s biggest rival, UCLA, moved in the opposite direction, admitting more California students than last year. The campus admitted 9,109 California resident students this fall compared with 8,589 in fall 2025, the data shows...

Full story at https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/admissions-uc-data-2026-22368094.php

Sunday, August 2, 2026

Yesterday's COLA


If you are receiving a UC pension that began before July 1, you should have received a 2% COLA (cost of living adjustment) increase as of yesterday. Yes, inflation is running above 2%, but the COLA formula does not provide complete protection against inflation above 2%.

The University of California Retirement Plan (UCRP) COLA formula matches the annual increase in the California Consumer Price Index (CPI) up to 2%, plus 75% of the CPI increase exceeding 4%, up to a maximum adjustment of 6%.

Straws in the Wind - Part 421

From the Washington Post: A West Point professor and his colleagues will remain ungagged for now, after the military academy declined to appeal a judge’s ruling that barred the school from restricting professors’ public comments. The West Point policy, adopted early last year, says no professor can give a speech, publish a paper or speak on a podcast without seeking approval from their department head. School leadership announced it a month after President Donald Trump issued an executive order forbidding military service academies from “promoting, advancing or otherwise inculcating” ideas deemed “un-American” or “divisive.” In late 2025, West Point’s longest-serving law professor, Tim Bakken, sued the academy in federal court over the policy...

West Point sought to dismiss the suit. Last month, federal judge Cathy Seibel, a President George W. Bush nominee, issued an interim ruling saying West Point cannot enforce the policy for civilian professors while Bakken’s case proceeds. Seibel also barred West Point from preventing Bakken from sharing his personal opinions with students. The academy had until Monday to appeal her ruling, but it did not do so...

Full story at https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2026/07/29/west-point-professors-free-comment-publicly-school-declines-appeal-ruling/.


 

Stonegarden

From CalMatters: ...Operation Stonegarden, a grant managed by the Department of Homeland Security, allocates an average of $11 million each year for California law enforcement agencies to work with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and its subagency Border Patrol on border security missions. Dozens of police forces throughout the state receive the grant, including campus police at UC San Diego, a recipient since around 2012.

On Feb. 10, a CalMatters article explained how UC San Diego police used the grant to patrol sections of the coastline near campus, which quickly set off an uproar among students who felt it placed undocumented and international students at risk. By Feb. 26, after students emailed complaints and threatened to hold a public rally, student Aryan Dixit said the campus police chief, Lamine Secka, agreed to leave the grant program in a one-on-one meeting. 

...University vice chancellor, Niraj Dangoria, stated in [an] email that university police have not participated in Stonegarden activities since 2024, which the university’s Communications team affirmed. The 2024 funding agreement states operations would last from April 2025 to February 2027...

Full story at https://calmatters.org/education/2026/07/uc-san-diego-homeland-security-border-patrol-students-protest/.

Will Harvard Continue to Lead the Charge? - Part 186

From the Boston Globe: Researchers and teachers represented by the Harvard Academic Workers union (HAW-UAW) have voted to authorize a strike over stalled contract negotiations with administrators at the Ivy League university, according to a statement from the union. The vote, taken Friday [July 23], came after 43 bargaining sessions in which the union claimed its needs were not met, and allows for the union’s bargaining committee to implement a strike if they feel as though negotiations continue to stall, said union member Maggie Doherty, who is a lecturer in Harvard’s English department. The union, which was formed in April 2024, represents about 2,500 non-tenure track researchers and teachers across Harvard, said Doherty.

The union claims that the Harvard administration has refused to address their needs for “fair pay, job security and workload protections, better protection for non-US citizen workers, real recourse for discrimination and harassment, and the right to a strong union,” the statement said. ...There has not yet been any response from the Harvard administration to the Strike Authorization Vote (SAV) result yet... A spokesperson for Harvard could not immediately be reached for comment by the Globe...

Full story at https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/07/27/metro/harvard-researchers-teachers-strike/.

Saturday, August 1, 2026

More Stay Away from Wilshire

 

I Never Promised You a Rose Bowl? - Part 19 (See you in September)

From Pasadena Now: Lawyers for UCLA and the city will return to court Sept. 2 to resume a case management conference in the lawsuit the city and the Rose Bowl Operating Company filed to keep UCLA football at the historic stadium. According to the lawsuit, UCLA sought to leave the Rose Bowl and move its home football games to SoFi Stadium in Inglewood despite a lease that runs through 2044.

...For the city, the stakes extend beyond football. The Rose Bowl is owned by the city, and officials have said taxpayers funded more than $150 million in stadium renovations and refinanced approximately $130 million in bonds tied to capital improvements. The lawsuit alleges UCLA’s departure could cost the city and its residents more than $1 billion in damages...

The city argues the lease, signed in 2010 and amended in 2014, contains no early termination clause and requires the Bruins to play their home football games at the Rose Bowl through June 30, 2044. The agreement also prohibits UCLA from playing home games at another venue in Los Angeles or Orange counties...

Full story at https://pasadenanow.com/main/ucla-city-to-return-to-court-sept-2-in-rose-bowl-lease-dispute.

Straws in the Wind - Part 420 (Bear With Us)

From the Cornell Daily Sun: Cornell has updated its Community Living Standards to include a clause banning the processing of wild animals in communal kitchens. The update follows a September incident in which students skinned and butchered a legally hunted bear in a shared kitchen in GanÄ™dagÇ«: Hall, a residence hall on North Campus. A University spokesperson confirmed that the update is a response to the GanÄ™dagÇ«: Hall incident...  

On Sept. 6, two students hunted and killed an adult black bear in the Department of Environmental Conservation’s Region 4, approximately two hours from campus, before bringing it back to GanÄ™dagÇ«: Hall to process it. Aaron Chin ’27, one of the bear skinners who revealed himself on the MeatEater Podcast, explained on the podcast that they intended to process the bear at a friend’s place, but they ran into an “emergency” and took it to the dormitory kitchen, not wanting to let the meat spoil. The skinning was met with online backlash on Reddit and Sidechat, an anonymous social media platform, as images circulated showing the bear’s remains on the shared kitchen table and meat stored in ziploc bags in the dorm’s communal fridge...

Full story at https://www.cornellsun.com/article/2026/07/ytg8jgs7qs3k.

So, was the smoke he was smelling coming from the kitchen?


Or direct to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNdFs0wRxDg

Yale Deal - Part 9

From the Yale Daily News: University President Maurie McInnis has engaged in private conversations with student leaders, as well as the faculty senate chair, about Yale’s attempts to settle with the Trump administration — a venture that has faced widespread backlash from students, faculty and alumni. Michael Farina, the chair of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Senate, wrote in [an] email to the News that he has spoken with McInnis about the potential settlement and felt optimistic.

“From our conversations, President McInnis’ words and actions are clearly heartfelt and forthright, and she has given us no reason to doubt her absolute sincerity in defending our academic freedom, the university, our faculty, and our students,” he wrote. “She is working to safeguard both Yale’s autonomy and our ability to accept the students of our choice. I am confident she will succeed in protecting both.”

...Four student leaders... met with McInnis... “In our meeting, we advocated for student concerns and shared them with President McInnis. We also sought clarity on what protecting students’ rights in this DOJ probe should look like,” the student leaders wrote in a joint... statement... that they plan to release more information about the meeting and their thoughts on it at a later date...

McInnis has refrained from making public comment about the settlement with the exception of a July 13 email to the Yale community, in which she confirmed that the University is seeking a voluntary resolution to the Department of Justice’s investigations into Yale admissions...

Full story at https://yaledailynews.com/articles/in-private-talks-mcinnis-leaves-faculty-leader-assured-on-trump-deal.

Parallel Blogs

We have been putting out this blog since 2009 under the heading "UCLA Faculty Association" using the link:

https://uclafacultyassociation.blogspot.com/

The blog site was originally created by the then-executive director of the Faculty Association. As such, yours truly does not have control of the site; he is simply a blogger on it. So when technical issues arise, that can be a problem. Given that issue, we have been experimenting with a parallel site with the same blog entries since July 23rd:

https://danmitchellsblogcontinues.blogspot.com/

We will be running the two in parallel for the indefinite future. Possibly, at some point we will switch to the new link.

If you read the blog using the Facebook page of Yousee Elayemeriti, you can continue to do so.