Robot-Written Peer Reviews: Computer-generated gobbledygook can pass for the real thing with many faculty members, study finds.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/09/22/many-academics-are-fooled-robot-written-peer-reviews
The headline says it all. But isn't the purpose of a peer review to demonstrate how smart the peer is compared to the author? Just asking.
Maybe I should ask the robot:
No comments:
Post a Comment